Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the health care industry, rapid ' often seismic ' change frequently feels like the norm. Even by that standard, however, in the past year or so, health care providers and others in the industry have felt under siege, due in no small part to the passage of the landmark federal health care reform law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, in March 2010. And it has been easy for hospitals and other health care providers to become fixated on the reform drama that is currently playing out in the halls of Congress, and in ballot boxes and federal courtrooms around the country, all the while scrambling to comply with the law's many provisions scheduled to phase-in over the next several years.
Consequently, many health care providers, understandably, have lost sight of another significant change in the industry that has been afoot since mid-2009 ' the imposition of affirmative action laws and regulations on hospitals and other health care providers that are considered federal government contractors or subcontractors. Government contractor or subcontractor status has far-reaching implications and potentially dire consequences for health care providers ' subjecting them to close government scrutiny of their employment practices, and where they are
not in compliance with their affirmative action obligations, the possibility of significant financial liability, among other things, for unsuspecting violations of those obligations.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.