Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes BulletinKickerFeaturesTopicsLitigationRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Attorneys and Whistleblowing

By Howard W. Goldstein
June 28, 2011

The False Claims Act (FCA), enacted shortly after the Civil War, allows private parties, known as relators, to bring qui tam actions on behalf of the United States government for violating the Act, and awards those parties up to 30% of all monies recovered. See 31 U.S.C. ' 3730(d). Similarly, under the new Dodd-Frank Act regulations, whistleblowers may reap up to 30% of the damages over $1 million. But for lawyers, there's more to the calculus than just the potential payouts. Disclosing client confidences is fraught with difficult legal and ethical issues that are only further complicated when financial incentive drives disclosure.

While the FCA does not expressly prohibit an attorney-relator, a recent opinion from the Southern District of New York, United States ex rel. Fair Lab. Practices Assocs. v. Quest Diagnostics Inc., 05-Civ-5393, 2011 WL 1330542 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 4, 2011), indicates that lawyers will typically be prohibited from bringing qui tam actions against their former clients. And the new Dodd-Frank regulations expressly limit when an attorney can reap a whistleblower reward.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.