Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
$44.3 Million False Claims Act Settlement Reached With Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Serono
On May 4, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that pharmaceutical manufacturer Serono Laboratories Inc., along with affiliated entities EMD Serono Inc., Merck Serono S.A., and Ares Trading S.A. (collectively “Serono”), had reached an agreement to pay $44.3 million to resolve allegations under the False Claims Act. The charges arose from Serono's marketing of Rebif, the company's recombinant interferon injectable that was introduced in the beginning of 2002. Rebif is used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis.
According to the allegations revealed in the settlement, beginning with Rebif's release and continuing through the end of 2009, Serono paid health care providers to induce their promotion and prescription of the drug, including via payments for attending events such as marketing meetings and speaker training programs at upscale resorts. As alleged, these actions resulted in the submission of false Medicare and Medicaid claims.
In announcing the resolution, Tony West, Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ's Civil Division, made the following statement: “It's imperative that medical determinations are guided by a patient's needs, not tainted by illegal incentives or fraud ' We are committed to ensuring that the chronically ill and other vulnerable members in our communities who rely on Medicare and Medicaid programs receive the best possible care.”
In connection with Serono's settlement, the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services extended the company's pre-existing corporate integrity agreement (CIA) for an additional three years, along with making several substantive enhancements to its requirements. Particularly, as announced by the DOJ, the CIA now places responsibility for Serono's compliance in the hands of its executives and directors.
SEC Issues First DPA As Part of FCPA Settlement with Pipe Manufacturer Tenaris S.A.
On May 17, in connection with a combined DOJ and SEC settlement of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) allegations against steel pipe manufacturer Tenaris S.A. (Tenaris), the SEC announced its first-ever use of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA). Tenaris, a Luxembourg-based publicly traded company, was accused of bribing Uzbekistan officials to gain access to confidential competitors' bids in attempts to secure oil pipeline contracts, along with a corresponding failure to accurately record those payments on the company's books and records.
As part of the settlement, Tenaris agreed to pay a $3.5 million criminal penalty in connection with a non-prosecution agreement from the DOJ, in addition to $5.4 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest paid to the SEC as part of the two-year civil DPA.
According to the DOJ, “[t]he criminal penalty in this case constitutes a substantially reduced monetary penalty and reflects the department's commitment to providing meaningful credit to Tenaris for its extraordinary cooperation with the department.”
The SEC's use of a DPA represents an additional step in pursuing its enforcement cooperation initiative, first announced on Jan. 13, 2010. As part of the initiative, the Commission announced its intention to utilize cooperation tools traditionally employed in criminal enforcement.
Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by Matthew J. Alexander. He is an associate at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
$44.3 Million False Claims Act Settlement Reached With Pharmaceutical Manufacturer Serono
On May 4, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that pharmaceutical manufacturer Serono Laboratories Inc., along with affiliated entities EMD Serono Inc., Merck Serono S.A., and Ares Trading S.A. (collectively “Serono”), had reached an agreement to pay $44.3 million to resolve allegations under the False Claims Act. The charges arose from Serono's marketing of Rebif, the company's recombinant interferon injectable that was introduced in the beginning of 2002. Rebif is used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis.
According to the allegations revealed in the settlement, beginning with Rebif's release and continuing through the end of 2009, Serono paid health care providers to induce their promotion and prescription of the drug, including via payments for attending events such as marketing meetings and speaker training programs at upscale resorts. As alleged, these actions resulted in the submission of false Medicare and Medicaid claims.
In announcing the resolution, Tony West, Assistant Attorney General for the DOJ's Civil Division, made the following statement: “It's imperative that medical determinations are guided by a patient's needs, not tainted by illegal incentives or fraud ' We are committed to ensuring that the chronically ill and other vulnerable members in our communities who rely on Medicare and Medicaid programs receive the best possible care.”
In connection with Serono's settlement, the Office of the Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services extended the company's pre-existing corporate integrity agreement (CIA) for an additional three years, along with making several substantive enhancements to its requirements. Particularly, as announced by the DOJ, the CIA now places responsibility for Serono's compliance in the hands of its executives and directors.
SEC Issues First DPA As Part of FCPA Settlement with Pipe Manufacturer Tenaris S.A.
On May 17, in connection with a combined DOJ and SEC settlement of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) allegations against steel pipe manufacturer Tenaris S.A. (Tenaris), the SEC announced its first-ever use of a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA). Tenaris, a Luxembourg-based publicly traded company, was accused of bribing Uzbekistan officials to gain access to confidential competitors' bids in attempts to secure oil pipeline contracts, along with a corresponding failure to accurately record those payments on the company's books and records.
As part of the settlement, Tenaris agreed to pay a $3.5 million criminal penalty in connection with a non-prosecution agreement from the DOJ, in addition to $5.4 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest paid to the SEC as part of the two-year civil DPA.
According to the DOJ, “[t]he criminal penalty in this case constitutes a substantially reduced monetary penalty and reflects the department's commitment to providing meaningful credit to Tenaris for its extraordinary cooperation with the department.”
The SEC's use of a DPA represents an additional step in pursuing its enforcement cooperation initiative, first announced on Jan. 13, 2010. As part of the initiative, the Commission announced its intention to utilize cooperation tools traditionally employed in criminal enforcement.
Business Crimes Hotline and In the Courts were written by Matthew J. Alexander. He is an associate at
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?