Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In 2010, Thailand proposed mandating the use of highly emotive graphic warnings on all domestic and imported wine, beer and liquor bottles with the aim of deterring consumers from drinking alcohol. These proposed labels would cover 30%-50% of the bottles' surface or packaging area. It is expected that other countries will follow Thailand's lead. The Thai proposal raises important questions about the role of warning labels. It also widens the debate over the appropriate balance between regulators' efforts to protect public health, and consumers' individual choice. Requiring graphic warnings on alcohol bottles also raises a plethora of constitutional, intellectual property and international trade law issues. This is particularly so, given that empirical evidence indicates that graphic warnings, while more emotive than text-only warnings, do not change consumer behavior. In light of the World Health Organization's international strategy to reduce the use of alcohol, these issues are becoming increasingly important and the implications need to be understood.
Common Law Duty to Warn
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.