Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The attorney-client privilege is viewed as the most sacred of all legally recognized privileges. The preservation of the privilege is essential to the fair operation of our legal system as it promotes and encourages open communications between the client and the attorney; this, in turn, allows the attorney to provide effective and comprehensive advice. The privilege is not absolute, but as demonstrated on May 10, 2011, by the dismissal under Rule 29 of a criminal indictment charging GlaxoSmithKline associate general counsel Lauren Stevens, the piercing of the privilege should occur only in exceptional circumstances. See United States v. Stevens, Case No. RWT-10-694 (D. MD).
As today's regulatory environment becomes more invasive, the government is more frequently attempting to examine and evaluate legal advice provided by corporate attorneys to their clients when it believes that a client is using a lawyer to commit a crime or fraud. The crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege allows the government, often ex parte, to obtain a court order demanding the production of what were once thought to be privileged communications.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.