Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On April 20, 2011, the Federal Circuit issued its opinion in the TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corp. case. No. 2009-1374 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2011). The decision marks a sea change for evaluating contempt of an injunction in a patent case, significantly limiting an infringer's ability to challenge an injunction on the grounds that it is vague or overbroad.
In the district court, a jury found that EchoStar Corporation (“EchoStar”) had willfully infringed TiVo Inc.'s (“TiVo”) patent. The district court then issued a permanent injunction against EchoStar with two provisions: 1) an infringement provision prohibiting EchoStar from making, using, offering to sell, and selling the models that were found to have infringed TiVo's patent, and 2) a disablement provision requiring EchoStar to disable Digital Video Recording (“DVR”) functionality in satellite television receivers already being used by EchoStar customers and in products that had not yet shipped to customers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.