Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act creates new financial incentives for employees who cooperate with or provide information to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with violations of the securities laws, and also creates a new anti-retaliation cause of action for employees who participate in this program. Dodd-Frank also expands the existing Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) whistleblower anti-retaliation provision, and creates other new anti-retaliation causes of action for whistleblowers who provide information to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. In response to the new Dodd-Frank whistleblower bounty provisions, plaintiffs' lawyers are already soliciting whistleblowing tips from employees of multinational corporations across the globe.
However, two preliminary questions that employment lawyers should ask are: 1) whether employees who reside outside the United States may be ineligible for such bounties; and 2) whether such employees could bring whistleblower retaliation claims under Dodd-Frank challenging terminations or other employment actions outside of the United States.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.