Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The unauthorized copying of software may spur claims of copyright infringement; the downloading of copyrighted music from file-sharing websites may prompt an infringement suit; or the online posting of copyrighted materials without permission may justify the transmittal of a takedown notice to a website operator. Beyond these common infringements, however, is the inclusion of copyrighted works in legal filings with courts and arbitration panels. In such cases, an attorney or party will rarely obtain authorization from the copyright holder prior to submitting papers containing excerpts of copyrighted works. While this practice rarely results in a dispute, it presents interesting questions of copyright law, namely, whether a litigant may invoke the “fair use” doctrine to reproduce copyrighted materials for use as exhibits in judicial or quasi-judicial proceedings without first securing the permission of the copyright holder.
This article discusses recent decisions regarding the use of copyrighted material in legal proceedings and the applicability of the fair use defense to allegations of infringement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.