Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What happens to the traveler in a different time zone who needs to communicate with his physician? In the past, it would have been a huge problem trying to deal with morning in one part of the world and evening in the other. Now, we can send our doctor a text or e-mail, and she can respond when the opportunity arises, whether she is at home or in the office. And with modern technology at everyone's fingertips, not only can we quickly communicate with our doctors, they also can access a wealth of medical information, including our medical records. It is a terrific use of technology for everyone. And it is the future.
But all is not sweetness and light. What are the factors that need to be considered when using mHealth devices?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.