Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What happens to the traveler in a different time zone who needs to communicate with his physician? In the past, it would have been a huge problem trying to deal with morning in one part of the world and evening in the other. Now, we can send our doctor a text or e-mail, and she can respond when the opportunity arises, whether she is at home or in the office. And with modern technology at everyone's fingertips, not only can we quickly communicate with our doctors, they also can access a wealth of medical information, including our medical records. It is a terrific use of technology for everyone. And it is the future.
But all is not sweetness and light. What are the factors that need to be considered when using mHealth devices?
A Growing Force
First, let's define what we mean by mHealth. It is the use of mobile devices such as smart phones and tablets, like the iPad, that enable the transmission of patient information by health care providers at the point of care. Lewis, Nicole, “Mobile Health to Transform Healthcare Delivery,” Information Week, April 7, 2011, www.informationweek.com/news/healthcare/mobile-wireless/229401173.
mHealth is the future of health care communication. Surveys can barely keep up with physicians' use of mobile technologies. With Apple products seemingly the frontrunner, one study found that a full 75% of physicians owned an iPad, iPhone or iPod. Other studies have found that 81% of physicians are using smart phones and 30% are using the iPad tablet (with another 28% expecting to buy one within six months). The general public's use of these technologies is growing too, with 36% of consumers now using smart phones with apps and e-mail at their fingertips. Fewer ' only 5% ' use tablets, but that number has almost doubled in the past year and will surely continue to grow. Whitney, Lance, “Nielsen:
Tablets Are Hot, But Few Actually Own One,” cnet, May 20, 2011, http://news.cnet.com/nielsen-tablets-arehot-but-few-actually-own-one/8301-17938_105-20064626-1.html?tag=mncol;5n.
The market is responding to this interest. The mobile health care market will approach $10 billion in the next five years, according to a report from global management consulting firm Arthur D. Little. “Capturing Value in the mHealth Oasis: An Opportunity for Mobile Network Operators?” Arthur D. Little Consulting, www.adlittle.com/uploads/tx_extthoughtleadership/ADL_mHealth.pdf. The report notes the power mHealth has to transform the health environment from physician-centric to patient-centric and improve quality of care: “mHealth enables critical decision support to be leveraged at the point-of-care, ensuring the accuracy of clinical information and leading to higher quality patient outcomes while reducing medical errors, which are estimated to cost the U.S. $19.5 billion annually.”
Potential and Peril for the Health Care Community
The development of mHealth technologies, paired with the rapid adoption of them by physicians, is like a runaway train ' exciting, yet perilous. The hope and potential of these technologies is their ability to help doctors do their jobs better, enhance communication with patients and make patients happier and healthier. But there are also risks involved, especially as the embrace of these technologies by the medical community outpaces safeguards put in place to protect patient safety and privacy. Providers are exposed to HIPAA violation penalties, and the growing use of mobile devices by the medical community carries a host of new concerns related to malpractice and other lawsuits.
Some of the positive developments in mHealth technologies are:
Conclusion
Next month we will look at some of the problems mobile technology can create for medical practitioners ' from causing patient privacy breaches to prompting wrong diagnoses ' and at ways of controlling the risks. We will also discuss how attorneys for medical providers can use information contained in mobile devices to help them prepare for litigation.
Linda S. Crawford, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, teaches trial advocacy at Harvard Law School. She has been consulting with defendants on research-based effectiveness at deposition and trial since 1985.
What happens to the traveler in a different time zone who needs to communicate with his physician? In the past, it would have been a huge problem trying to deal with morning in one part of the world and evening in the other. Now, we can send our doctor a text or e-mail, and she can respond when the opportunity arises, whether she is at home or in the office. And with modern technology at everyone's fingertips, not only can we quickly communicate with our doctors, they also can access a wealth of medical information, including our medical records. It is a terrific use of technology for everyone. And it is the future.
But all is not sweetness and light. What are the factors that need to be considered when using mHealth devices?
A Growing Force
First, let's define what we mean by mHealth. It is the use of mobile devices such as smart phones and tablets, like the iPad, that enable the transmission of patient information by health care providers at the point of care.
mHealth is the future of health care communication. Surveys can barely keep up with physicians' use of mobile technologies. With
Tablets Are Hot, But Few Actually Own One,” cnet, May 20, 2011, http://news.cnet.com/nielsen-tablets-arehot-but-few-actually-own-one/8301-17938_105-20064626-1.html?tag=mncol;5n.
The market is responding to this interest. The mobile health care market will approach $10 billion in the next five years, according to a report from global management consulting firm Arthur D. Little. “Capturing Value in the mHealth Oasis: An Opportunity for Mobile Network Operators?” Arthur D. Little Consulting, www.adlittle.com/uploads/tx_extthoughtleadership/ADL_mHealth.pdf. The report notes the power mHealth has to transform the health environment from physician-centric to patient-centric and improve quality of care: “mHealth enables critical decision support to be leveraged at the point-of-care, ensuring the accuracy of clinical information and leading to higher quality patient outcomes while reducing medical errors, which are estimated to cost the U.S. $19.5 billion annually.”
Potential and Peril for the Health Care Community
The development of mHealth technologies, paired with the rapid adoption of them by physicians, is like a runaway train ' exciting, yet perilous. The hope and potential of these technologies is their ability to help doctors do their jobs better, enhance communication with patients and make patients happier and healthier. But there are also risks involved, especially as the embrace of these technologies by the medical community outpaces safeguards put in place to protect patient safety and privacy. Providers are exposed to HIPAA violation penalties, and the growing use of mobile devices by the medical community carries a host of new concerns related to malpractice and other lawsuits.
Some of the positive developments in mHealth technologies are:
Conclusion
Next month we will look at some of the problems mobile technology can create for medical practitioners ' from causing patient privacy breaches to prompting wrong diagnoses ' and at ways of controlling the risks. We will also discuss how attorneys for medical providers can use information contained in mobile devices to help them prepare for litigation.
Linda S. Crawford, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, teaches trial advocacy at
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.