Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
COPYRIGHT FAIR USE/STAGE PRODUCTIONS
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled it was copyright fair use for the music group Green Day to include plaintiff Derek Seltzer's drawing “Scream Icon” as part of a video backdrop when the band played its song “East Jesus Nowhere” in concert. Seltzer v. Green Day Inc., CV 10-2103. Green Day's set designer Richard Staub had taken the “Scream” image from a wall on which Seltzer had displayed it in Los Angeles.
District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez found: “[T]he video backdrop created for East Jesus Nowhere is transformative. The different visual elements Staub added, including graffiti, a brick backdrop, and (especially) the large red cross over the image, considered in connection with the music and lyrics of East Jesus Nowhere, 'add[] something new, with a further purpose or different character' than Plaintiff's original work'” (quoting Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994). The district judge also noted “that because Defendants' use of Scream Icon was transformative, it is not likely to usurp the original or derivative market for Plaintiff's work.”
The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut decided it lacked personal jurisdiction over a Canadian-based developer of a movie-times mobile application. West World Media (WWM) v. Ikamobile Ltd., 3:11cv00169. Ridgefield, CT-based West World compiles and sells movie showtime data. Ikamobile distributes the ad-supported cell-phone application Movie Finder. West World sued, alleging Ikamobile users access information that West World gathers. Causes of action included “hot news” misappropriation and violation of Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practices Act. Dismissing the suit, District Judge Alvin W. Thompson emphasized: “Although Ikamobile conveys information to customers of movie theaters in Connecticut, it does not do so for the purpose of soliciting or continuing to get business from Connecticut consumers, but instead, does so for the purpose of soliciting and continuing to get business from Ikamobile's advertisers, who give or will give business to Ikamobile because of the information Ikamobile puts on its website. ' Also, there is no allegation that any such advertiser or potential advertiser is located in Connecticut.”
COPYRIGHT FAIR USE/STAGE PRODUCTIONS
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled it was copyright fair use for the music group Green Day to include plaintiff Derek Seltzer's drawing “Scream Icon” as part of a video backdrop when the band played its song “East Jesus Nowhere” in concert. Seltzer v. Green Day Inc., CV 10-2103. Green Day's set designer Richard Staub had taken the “Scream” image from a wall on which Seltzer had displayed it in Los Angeles.
District Judge
The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut decided it lacked personal jurisdiction over a Canadian-based developer of a movie-times mobile application. West World Media (WWM) v. Ikamobile Ltd., 3:11cv00169. Ridgefield, CT-based West World compiles and sells movie showtime data. Ikamobile distributes the ad-supported cell-phone application Movie Finder. West World sued, alleging Ikamobile users access information that West World gathers. Causes of action included “hot news” misappropriation and violation of Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practices Act. Dismissing the suit, District Judge
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?