Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Cameo Clips

By Stan Soocher
August 29, 2011

COPYRIGHT FAIR USE/STAGE PRODUCTIONS

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled it was copyright fair use for the music group Green Day to include plaintiff Derek Seltzer's drawing “Scream Icon” as part of a video backdrop when the band played its song “East Jesus Nowhere” in concert. Seltzer v. Green Day Inc., CV 10-2103. Green Day's set designer Richard Staub had taken the “Scream” image from a wall on which Seltzer had displayed it in Los Angeles.

District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez found: “[T]he video backdrop created for East Jesus Nowhere is transformative. The different visual elements Staub added, including graffiti, a brick backdrop, and (especially) the large red cross over the image, considered in connection with the music and lyrics of East Jesus Nowhere, 'add[] something new, with a further purpose or different character' than Plaintiff's original work'” (quoting Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc., 510 U.S. 569 (1994). The district judge also noted “that because Defendants' use of Scream Icon was transformative, it is not likely to usurp the original or derivative market for Plaintiff's work.”


MOBILE APPLICATIONS/PERSONAL JURISDICTION

The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut decided it lacked personal jurisdiction over a Canadian-based developer of a movie-times mobile application. West World Media (WWM) v. Ikamobile Ltd., 3:11cv00169. Ridgefield, CT-based West World compiles and sells movie showtime data. Ikamobile distributes the ad-supported cell-phone application Movie Finder. West World sued, alleging Ikamobile users access information that West World gathers. Causes of action included “hot news” misappropriation and violation of Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practices Act. Dismissing the suit, District Judge Alvin W. Thompson emphasized: “Although Ikamobile conveys information to customers of movie theaters in Connecticut, it does not do so for the purpose of soliciting or continuing to get business from Connecticut consumers, but instead, does so for the purpose of soliciting and continuing to get business from Ikamobile's advertisers, who give or will give business to Ikamobile because of the information Ikamobile puts on its website. ' Also, there is no allegation that any such advertiser or potential advertiser is located in Connecticut.”


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.

COPYRIGHT FAIR USE/STAGE PRODUCTIONS

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled it was copyright fair use for the music group Green Day to include plaintiff Derek Seltzer's drawing “Scream Icon” as part of a video backdrop when the band played its song “East Jesus Nowhere” in concert. Seltzer v. Green Day Inc., CV 10-2103. Green Day's set designer Richard Staub had taken the “Scream” image from a wall on which Seltzer had displayed it in Los Angeles.

District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez found: “[T]he video backdrop created for East Jesus Nowhere is transformative. The different visual elements Staub added, including graffiti, a brick backdrop, and (especially) the large red cross over the image, considered in connection with the music and lyrics of East Jesus Nowhere , 'add[] something new, with a further purpose or different character' than Plaintiff's original work'” (quoting Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music Inc. , 510 U.S. 569 (1994). The district judge also noted “that because Defendants' use of Scream Icon was transformative, it is not likely to usurp the original or derivative market for Plaintiff's work.”


MOBILE APPLICATIONS/PERSONAL JURISDICTION

The U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut decided it lacked personal jurisdiction over a Canadian-based developer of a movie-times mobile application. West World Media (WWM) v. Ikamobile Ltd., 3:11cv00169. Ridgefield, CT-based West World compiles and sells movie showtime data. Ikamobile distributes the ad-supported cell-phone application Movie Finder. West World sued, alleging Ikamobile users access information that West World gathers. Causes of action included “hot news” misappropriation and violation of Connecticut's Unfair Trade Practices Act. Dismissing the suit, District Judge Alvin W. Thompson emphasized: “Although Ikamobile conveys information to customers of movie theaters in Connecticut, it does not do so for the purpose of soliciting or continuing to get business from Connecticut consumers, but instead, does so for the purpose of soliciting and continuing to get business from Ikamobile's advertisers, who give or will give business to Ikamobile because of the information Ikamobile puts on its website. ' Also, there is no allegation that any such advertiser or potential advertiser is located in Connecticut.”


Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and a tenured Associate Professor of Music & Entertainment Industry Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He can be reached at [email protected] or via www.stansoocher.com.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?