Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Leaving a law firm for the first time is understandably difficult for many long-standing attorneys, also known as “lifers.” Indeed, the “breakup” may generate complex and competing emotions. Those taking leave due to “pull factors,” such as career-focused opportunities, may experience conflicting loyalties and guilty feelings about leaving, not only during the departure phase, but even after establishing themselves at their new firms. Deep ties to originating firms are also evident even for those separating as a result of “push factors” such as compensation, promotion or philosophical disagreements. After the resentment dissipates, some attorneys carry the responsibility of their parting long after their departure. And in cases where attorneys are asked to leave their originating firms, some try to undo or deter their dismissals, in part because of an enduring sense of connection that is hard to break.
Loyalty and Attachment
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.