Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 30, 2011

Altered Warning Recommends Modest Dosing of Anemia Drugs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absolutely necessary. The agency has determined that when ESAs are used to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absol'd to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis. Marketed under the names Epogen and Procrit (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp (darbepoetin alfa), ESAs approved to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease were specifically identified in the June 24 FDA release describing the altered package warnings. In announcing the changes, John Jenkins, MD, director of the Office of New Drugs in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research said, “Health care practitioners should carefully consider when to begin treatment with an ESA and actively monitor dosing in patients with chronic kidney disease, keeping in mind the increased risk for serious cardiovascular events, and should talk to their patients about these potential risk. The goal is to individualize therapy and use the lowest ESA dose possible to reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions.”

DEA Answers Petitioners: Marijuana Is Not Medicine

Nine years ago, the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis (CRC) petitioned the federal government seeking to get marijuana reclassified as medicinal. On July 9, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published its answer to the petitioner's request in the federal register: The DEA concluded that no reclassification is warranted because the federal government does not accept that there is any legitimate medical use for marijuana. The CRC is a group composed of many smaller groups and individuals that have banded together to get marijuana rescheduled on the DEA's list of controlled substances. The CRC and Americans for Safe Access (ASA) (another advocacy group in favor of making marijuana legal for medicinal purposes) filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit two weeks later. In a release announcing that appeal, ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford stated, “By ignoring the wealth of scientific evidence that clearly shows the therapeutic value of marijuana, the Obama Administration is playing politics at the expense of sick and dying Americans.”

FDA Answers Question: When Is New Premarket
Review Required?

The FDA released a draft guidance July 26 outlining its new premarket review expectations and procedures for modifications to medical devices that have already been approved under the 501(k) process. The process is the most common review path to market for low-risk medical devices that are substantially equivalent to another, already approved, medical device. By clarifying which changes to products need to be submitted to the FDA, the new premarket review standards are expected to make it easier for manufacturers to upgrade and modify devices already on the market. In a release, Jeffrey Shuren, MD, director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, explained, “We are making the regulatory process for medical devices less challenging by better describing our expectations.” For more information, go to: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm265458.htm.

Altered Warning Recommends Modest Dosing of Anemia Drugs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absolutely necessary. The agency has determined that when ESAs are used to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absol'd to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis. Marketed under the names Epogen and Procrit (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp (darbepoetin alfa), ESAs approved to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease were specifically identified in the June 24 FDA release describing the altered package warnings. In announcing the changes, John Jenkins, MD, director of the Office of New Drugs in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research said, “Health care practitioners should carefully consider when to begin treatment with an ESA and actively monitor dosing in patients with chronic kidney disease, keeping in mind the increased risk for serious cardiovascular events, and should talk to their patients about these potential risk. The goal is to individualize therapy and use the lowest ESA dose possible to reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions.”

DEA Answers Petitioners: Marijuana Is Not Medicine

Nine years ago, the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis (CRC) petitioned the federal government seeking to get marijuana reclassified as medicinal. On July 9, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published its answer to the petitioner's request in the federal register: The DEA concluded that no reclassification is warranted because the federal government does not accept that there is any legitimate medical use for marijuana. The CRC is a group composed of many smaller groups and individuals that have banded together to get marijuana rescheduled on the DEA's list of controlled substances. The CRC and Americans for Safe Access (ASA) (another advocacy group in favor of making marijuana legal for medicinal purposes) filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit two weeks later. In a release announcing that appeal, ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford stated, “By ignoring the wealth of scientific evidence that clearly shows the therapeutic value of marijuana, the Obama Administration is playing politics at the expense of sick and dying Americans.”

FDA Answers Question: When Is New Premarket
Review Required?

The FDA released a draft guidance July 26 outlining its new premarket review expectations and procedures for modifications to medical devices that have already been approved under the 501(k) process. The process is the most common review path to market for low-risk medical devices that are substantially equivalent to another, already approved, medical device. By clarifying which changes to products need to be submitted to the FDA, the new premarket review standards are expected to make it easier for manufacturers to upgrade and modify devices already on the market. In a release, Jeffrey Shuren, MD, director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, explained, “We are making the regulatory process for medical devices less challenging by better describing our expectations.” For more information, go to: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm265458.htm.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.