Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 30, 2011

Altered Warning Recommends Modest Dosing of Anemia Drugs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absolutely necessary. The agency has determined that when ESAs are used to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absol'd to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis. Marketed under the names Epogen and Procrit (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp (darbepoetin alfa), ESAs approved to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease were specifically identified in the June 24 FDA release describing the altered package warnings. In announcing the changes, John Jenkins, MD, director of the Office of New Drugs in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research said, “Health care practitioners should carefully consider when to begin treatment with an ESA and actively monitor dosing in patients with chronic kidney disease, keeping in mind the increased risk for serious cardiovascular events, and should talk to their patients about these potential risk. The goal is to individualize therapy and use the lowest ESA dose possible to reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions.”

DEA Answers Petitioners: Marijuana Is Not Medicine

Nine years ago, the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis (CRC) petitioned the federal government seeking to get marijuana reclassified as medicinal. On July 9, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published its answer to the petitioner's request in the federal register: The DEA concluded that no reclassification is warranted because the federal government does not accept that there is any legitimate medical use for marijuana. The CRC is a group composed of many smaller groups and individuals that have banded together to get marijuana rescheduled on the DEA's list of controlled substances. The CRC and Americans for Safe Access (ASA) (another advocacy group in favor of making marijuana legal for medicinal purposes) filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit two weeks later. In a release announcing that appeal, ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford stated, “By ignoring the wealth of scientific evidence that clearly shows the therapeutic value of marijuana, the Obama Administration is playing politics at the expense of sick and dying Americans.”

FDA Answers Question: When Is New Premarket
Review Required?

The FDA released a draft guidance July 26 outlining its new premarket review expectations and procedures for modifications to medical devices that have already been approved under the 501(k) process. The process is the most common review path to market for low-risk medical devices that are substantially equivalent to another, already approved, medical device. By clarifying which changes to products need to be submitted to the FDA, the new premarket review standards are expected to make it easier for manufacturers to upgrade and modify devices already on the market. In a release, Jeffrey Shuren, MD, director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, explained, “We are making the regulatory process for medical devices less challenging by better describing our expectations.” For more information, go to: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm265458.htm.

Altered Warning Recommends Modest Dosing of Anemia Drugs

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absolutely necessary. The agency has determined that when ESAs are used to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has altered the Boxed Warnings and other enclosed literature in the packaging of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) to indicate that, for safety reasons, they should only be used when absol'd to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease, those individuals are at increased risk of suffering adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke and thrombosis. Marketed under the names Epogen and Procrit (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp (darbepoetin alfa), ESAs approved to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease were specifically identified in the June 24 FDA release describing the altered package warnings. In announcing the changes, John Jenkins, MD, director of the Office of New Drugs in the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research said, “Health care practitioners should carefully consider when to begin treatment with an ESA and actively monitor dosing in patients with chronic kidney disease, keeping in mind the increased risk for serious cardiovascular events, and should talk to their patients about these potential risk. The goal is to individualize therapy and use the lowest ESA dose possible to reduce the need for red blood cell transfusions.”

DEA Answers Petitioners: Marijuana Is Not Medicine

Nine years ago, the Coalition for Rescheduling Cannabis (CRC) petitioned the federal government seeking to get marijuana reclassified as medicinal. On July 9, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) published its answer to the petitioner's request in the federal register: The DEA concluded that no reclassification is warranted because the federal government does not accept that there is any legitimate medical use for marijuana. The CRC is a group composed of many smaller groups and individuals that have banded together to get marijuana rescheduled on the DEA's list of controlled substances. The CRC and Americans for Safe Access (ASA) (another advocacy group in favor of making marijuana legal for medicinal purposes) filed an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit two weeks later. In a release announcing that appeal, ASA Chief Counsel Joe Elford stated, “By ignoring the wealth of scientific evidence that clearly shows the therapeutic value of marijuana, the Obama Administration is playing politics at the expense of sick and dying Americans.”

FDA Answers Question: When Is New Premarket
Review Required?

The FDA released a draft guidance July 26 outlining its new premarket review expectations and procedures for modifications to medical devices that have already been approved under the 501(k) process. The process is the most common review path to market for low-risk medical devices that are substantially equivalent to another, already approved, medical device. By clarifying which changes to products need to be submitted to the FDA, the new premarket review standards are expected to make it easier for manufacturers to upgrade and modify devices already on the market. In a release, Jeffrey Shuren, MD, director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, explained, “We are making the regulatory process for medical devices less challenging by better describing our expectations.” For more information, go to: www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm265458.htm.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.