Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Relationships are challenging. Add to the mix the dynamic of a spouse who is creative (the “Creative Spouse”), and must rely in large part on his or her spouse to provide both financial and personal support (the “Supporting Spouse”) for a dream to be realized. The passage of time with no success may lead to heightened tensions as the Supporting Spouse demands that the Creative Spouse wake up and share the burdens of financial responsibility. This financial tension may ultimately lead to a divorce.
While it may be relatively clear-cut to determine the value of real property, financial accounts and even a professional practice, when a Supporting Spouse and a Creative Spouse divorce, the question may arise as to how to distribute the value of the intellectual property or “celebrity status” that the Creative Spouse created during the marriage (the “Creative Asset”). Some Creative Assets may already have a market-defined value at the time of commencement, while some may only have an expectancy of value. This article considers what rights, if any, a Supporting Spouse may have in the value of a Creative Asset.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.