Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 28, 2011

FDA Seeks Input on Oversight of Medical Apps

Because myriad medical applications for mobile devices (apps) have been put on the market, the FDA is moving to regulate some of them. To that end, the agency recently published a Draft Guidance on Mobile Medical Applications. See

www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocumentsucm263280.htm
Jeffrey Shuren, M.D., J.D., director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, explained, however, that all mobile medical apps will not be regulated by the FDA: “Our draft approach calls for oversight of only those mobile medical apps that present the greatest risk to patients when they don't work as intended.” For example, things like calorie-counting apps will not be regulated, but those that are intended to work in concert with medical devices ' like an app that allows doctors to make a diagnosis by viewing a medical image from a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on a smartphone ' will be. The FDA also plans to ensure the safety and efficacy of apps that turn mobile media into medical devices, such as those that allow smartphones to act as an ECG machine that can be used to detect when a user is experiencing a heart attack.

Suits over Plavix and AlloDerm to Receive Centralized Handling

New Jersey's Supreme Court has designated suits over two medical products for centralized case management. The suits claim damages from the use of Plavix, an anti-clotting medication used to prevent heart attacks and strokes, and AlloDerm, a surgical mesh used in skin grafts. The plaintiffs in Adkins v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 07-cv-901, claim Plavix was advertised as gentler and more effective than aspirin, when in fact it was neither. According to the complaint, the FDA had to issue “numerous letters insisting these Defendants stop their misleading, over-promoting practices.” The lawsuits against Plavix manufacturers Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Sanofi-Aventis, and against the manufacturer of AlloDerm, LifeCell Corp, will be supervised by Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Jessica Mayer.

FDA Seeks Input on Oversight of Medical Apps

Because myriad medical applications for mobile devices (apps) have been put on the market, the FDA is moving to regulate some of them. To that end, the agency recently published a Draft Guidance on Mobile Medical Applications. See

www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocumentsucm263280.htm
Jeffrey Shuren, M.D., J.D., director of the FDA's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, explained, however, that all mobile medical apps will not be regulated by the FDA: “Our draft approach calls for oversight of only those mobile medical apps that present the greatest risk to patients when they don't work as intended.” For example, things like calorie-counting apps will not be regulated, but those that are intended to work in concert with medical devices ' like an app that allows doctors to make a diagnosis by viewing a medical image from a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) on a smartphone ' will be. The FDA also plans to ensure the safety and efficacy of apps that turn mobile media into medical devices, such as those that allow smartphones to act as an ECG machine that can be used to detect when a user is experiencing a heart attack.

Suits over Plavix and AlloDerm to Receive Centralized Handling

New Jersey's Supreme Court has designated suits over two medical products for centralized case management. The suits claim damages from the use of Plavix, an anti-clotting medication used to prevent heart attacks and strokes, and AlloDerm, a surgical mesh used in skin grafts. The plaintiffs in Adkins v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., 07-cv-901, claim Plavix was advertised as gentler and more effective than aspirin, when in fact it was neither. According to the complaint, the FDA had to issue “numerous letters insisting these Defendants stop their misleading, over-promoting practices.” The lawsuits against Plavix manufacturers Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and Sanofi-Aventis, and against the manufacturer of AlloDerm, LifeCell Corp, will be supervised by Middlesex County Superior Court Judge Jessica Mayer.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.