Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In today's uneasy economic climate, landlords and tenants alike are faced with the challenge of maximizing revenues, profits and cash flow. In situations where retailers are becoming more selective, leasing is slowing and rents are stagnating or moving lower, retail landlords have to be creative and resourceful in order to maintain and increase revenues.
One way to achieve this is to create more revenue-generating areas of the landlord's shopping center without incurring excessive cost and without sacrificing the synergistic mix and quality of the center. The leasing of common-area kiosks and carts is a good solution.
Kiosks and Carts
Common-area kiosks are small semi-structural transportable selling facilities that can be constructed within the common areas of most shopping centers. Common-area carts are usually much smaller, non-structural, and easier to relocate. These and other similar portable selling facilities can easily be located in the common areas of most shopping centers; however, they are more prevalent in enclosed regional malls and other regional shopping centers. Landlords often lease these facilities to operators who sell smaller, easy-to-carry items (such as pagers, cell phones and similar products) and food items not requiring significant preparation. Leases and license agreements for such facilities can provide for short or month-to-month terms (particularly for carts) or lengthier terms, similar to those provided to the tenants of in-line spaces. Rents and fees, similarly, can span the spectrum, depending upon the demand for such locations in a particular shopping center and the popularity of the center itself.
Step One for the Landlord
Before embarking on a kiosk and/or cart program, the landlord should confirm that the location of these facilities in the common areas is permitted under existing leases affecting the center. Many standard form in-line leases for regional mall premises are drafted broadly enough to permit such uses, by allowing the landlord to utilize the shopping center or common areas for promotional, commercial and other purposes in the landlord's reasonable discretion. However, landlords should review their existing leases to be safe. In addition, future leases should be drafted broadly enough to allow such uses. It would be advisable for future leases to provide specifically that the landlord can utilize the common areas to locate commercial kiosks, carts and similar facilities.
Step One for the Tenant
From the in-line tenant's perspective, it is important to limit the landlord's use of kiosk, cart and similar selling facilities in the common areas if they are going to interfere with, or otherwise disrupt, the in-line tenant's business. One way for the in-line tenant to protect itself is to negotiate for language in its lease that provides that the landlord will not locate any such facility within a mutually agreed-upon zone, which should be reflected on an exhibit to the lease. Another commonly negotiated compromise is an agreement between the parties that no such facilities will be located within a certain number of feet, measured from the in-line tenant's store front.
Conclusion
When representing the landlord, it is important when negotiating such compromises to limit any such restriction area to the areas located between the lease lines of the premises and to guarantee that existing structures, and replacements of same, will, at all times, be permitted.
The extent of a kiosk/cart restriction area is usually a function of the leverage between the parties in the particular transaction. However, there is usually sufficient room and compromise to allow landlords to enjoy the benefits of leasing portions of the common areas, without unduly interfering with existing tenants.
Scott Grossfeld is a Partner in the Los Angeles office of Cox, Castle & Nicholson LLP. Mr. Grossfeld's practice focuses on retail development and commercial leasing. He has extensive experience representing both landlords and tenants in all types of retail, office and industrial lease transactions.
In today's uneasy economic climate, landlords and tenants alike are faced with the challenge of maximizing revenues, profits and cash flow. In situations where retailers are becoming more selective, leasing is slowing and rents are stagnating or moving lower, retail landlords have to be creative and resourceful in order to maintain and increase revenues.
One way to achieve this is to create more revenue-generating areas of the landlord's shopping center without incurring excessive cost and without sacrificing the synergistic mix and quality of the center. The leasing of common-area kiosks and carts is a good solution.
Kiosks and Carts
Common-area kiosks are small semi-structural transportable selling facilities that can be constructed within the common areas of most shopping centers. Common-area carts are usually much smaller, non-structural, and easier to relocate. These and other similar portable selling facilities can easily be located in the common areas of most shopping centers; however, they are more prevalent in enclosed regional malls and other regional shopping centers. Landlords often lease these facilities to operators who sell smaller, easy-to-carry items (such as pagers, cell phones and similar products) and food items not requiring significant preparation. Leases and license agreements for such facilities can provide for short or month-to-month terms (particularly for carts) or lengthier terms, similar to those provided to the tenants of in-line spaces. Rents and fees, similarly, can span the spectrum, depending upon the demand for such locations in a particular shopping center and the popularity of the center itself.
Step One for the Landlord
Before embarking on a kiosk and/or cart program, the landlord should confirm that the location of these facilities in the common areas is permitted under existing leases affecting the center. Many standard form in-line leases for regional mall premises are drafted broadly enough to permit such uses, by allowing the landlord to utilize the shopping center or common areas for promotional, commercial and other purposes in the landlord's reasonable discretion. However, landlords should review their existing leases to be safe. In addition, future leases should be drafted broadly enough to allow such uses. It would be advisable for future leases to provide specifically that the landlord can utilize the common areas to locate commercial kiosks, carts and similar facilities.
Step One for the Tenant
From the in-line tenant's perspective, it is important to limit the landlord's use of kiosk, cart and similar selling facilities in the common areas if they are going to interfere with, or otherwise disrupt, the in-line tenant's business. One way for the in-line tenant to protect itself is to negotiate for language in its lease that provides that the landlord will not locate any such facility within a mutually agreed-upon zone, which should be reflected on an exhibit to the lease. Another commonly negotiated compromise is an agreement between the parties that no such facilities will be located within a certain number of feet, measured from the in-line tenant's store front.
Conclusion
When representing the landlord, it is important when negotiating such compromises to limit any such restriction area to the areas located between the lease lines of the premises and to guarantee that existing structures, and replacements of same, will, at all times, be permitted.
The extent of a kiosk/cart restriction area is usually a function of the leverage between the parties in the particular transaction. However, there is usually sufficient room and compromise to allow landlords to enjoy the benefits of leasing portions of the common areas, without unduly interfering with existing tenants.
Scott Grossfeld is a Partner in the Los Angeles office of
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?