Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Matrimonial StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

The Settlement Mindset

By Laurence J. Cutler and Robert A. Epstein
October 25, 2011

It is widely known among matrimonial practitioners that almost all cases settle ' well above 95%, in fact. It is also widely known that if, when, and how settlement is reached depends on countless factors including, but not limited to, a given set of factual circumstances (assets, liabilities, income, and the like), the parties, and ' not surprisingly ' the attorneys. The personalities of both the parties and their attorneys affect their willingness to settle. Presuming, (admittedly, perhaps unrealistically) that each attorney involved will have a similar knowledge of the facts, law, and the like, the way an attorney approaches a given matter often dictates the course of settlement.

For this reason, parties often research not only a matrimonial lawyer's pedigree, but the lawyer's reputation as well, before they decide whether to retain that person to act on their behalf. For the purpose of this article, the primary question a party researches in retaining a lawyer is whether the lawyer's mindset is more geared toward settlement or litigation. Certain matrimonial lawyers have a reputation for not knowing how to settle a case, preferring to litigate issues in court rather than to resolve issues peacefully in a conference room. However, most attorneys advise their clients that settling with their spouse, rather than engaging in the protracted and costly exercise where a trial judge decides the issues, is a better and far more cost effective resolution. One of the exceptions, perhaps, involves cases in which there exists a legal or valuation issue that would best be decided by a trial judge. Even in those cases, however, parties can attempt to resolve other issues to narrow those remaining before the court.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.