Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is widely known among matrimonial practitioners that almost all cases settle ' well above 95%, in fact. It is also widely known that if, when, and how settlement is reached depends on countless factors including, but not limited to, a given set of factual circumstances (assets, liabilities, income, and the like), the parties, and ' not surprisingly ' the attorneys. The personalities of both the parties and their attorneys affect their willingness to settle. Presuming, (admittedly, perhaps unrealistically) that each attorney involved will have a similar knowledge of the facts, law, and the like, the way an attorney approaches a given matter often dictates the course of settlement.
For this reason, parties often research not only a matrimonial lawyer's pedigree, but the lawyer's reputation as well, before they decide whether to retain that person to act on their behalf. For the purpose of this article, the primary question a party researches in retaining a lawyer is whether the lawyer's mindset is more geared toward settlement or litigation. Certain matrimonial lawyers have a reputation for not knowing how to settle a case, preferring to litigate issues in court rather than to resolve issues peacefully in a conference room. However, most attorneys advise their clients that settling with their spouse, rather than engaging in the protracted and costly exercise where a trial judge decides the issues, is a better and far more cost effective resolution. One of the exceptions, perhaps, involves cases in which there exists a legal or valuation issue that would best be decided by a trial judge. Even in those cases, however, parties can attempt to resolve other issues to narrow those remaining before the court.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.