Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Over their years of doing business, most suppliers of goods encounter situations involving distressed customers who have slid into bankruptcy. While savvy vendors have developed what are often quite effective strategies to minimize the harm resulting from these encounters, it is inevitable that even the most sophisticated supplier will get burned from time to time. Among the unhappy consequences often associated with a customer's bankruptcy are, among others, preference liability, large general unsecured claims, and being left to cope with the uncertainty of a customer's ongoing viability during and after its bankruptcy.
Of course, Congress has seen fit to alleviate some of these consequences over time. One prominent example was the creation of the 20-day administrative expense claim for sellers of goods received by a debtor during the 20 days prior to its bankruptcy filing. 11 U.S.C. ' 503(b)(9). Another notable example is the Bankruptcy Code's grant of administrative priority to so-called “gap period” claims. See 11 U.S.C. ” 502(f), 507(a)(3). Still another is the Code's recognition and preservation of a creditor's setoff rights under applicable state law.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.