Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

Third Circuit Weighs in on the Extortion Defense to Bribery

In a recent decision in a domestic bribery case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, after canvassing the law relating to extortion as a defense to federal bribery charges, identified the principal reasons why extortion is so rarely raised, and even more rarely effective, as a defense.

25 minute read November 22, 2011 at 01:32 PM
By
Bruce E. Yannett, Sean Hecker And Steven S. Michaels
Third Circuit Weighs in on the Extortion Defense to Bribery

Given that the legislative history of the Federal Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) makes clear Congress's intent that the statute not apply to cases of “true extortion” (see S. Rep.

This premium content is locked for Business Crimes Bulletin subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN Business Crimes Bulletin

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

Notice of Pendency Provided Constructive Notice to Foreclosure Sale Purchaser

September 01, 2026

Zoning Board Properly Construed OrdinanceNeighbors’ Open Meetings Law Challenge to Lease to Wireless Character Was UntimelyPlanning Board Not Bound to Consider Approval’s Impact on Easement or Covenant

September 01, 2026

Tax Escalation Clause Does Not Entitle Landlord to Collect Additional Rent On Taxes Landlord Did Not PayGood Guy Guaranty Does Not Cover Obligations Accruing After SurrenderStipulation In Prior Proceeding Did Not Bar Use and Occupancy ClaimFlooding Was Outside the Scope of Landlord’s Responsibility

September 01, 2026