Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Expanding Fiduciary Exposure Under ERISA

By Edward A. Marshall
November 23, 2011

Over the past five years, fiduciaries overseeing 401(k) plans have faced an unwelcome barrage of litigation regarding the fees associated with plan investments and administration. Among other things, the plaintiffs' bar has targeted ERISA fiduciaries with lawsuits alleging that the fees paid to investment managers and service providers were “excessive,” imprudently evaluated, and inadequately disclosed to plan participants. Given the sheer size of certain corporate plans, the liability exposure in class actions making such claims can be frightening, even when the per-participant “loss” flowing from an allegedly imprudent fiduciary decision is relatively miniscule.

Thankfully, smaller plans ' such as those administered by most law firms ' have (to date) received scant attention from the plaintiffs' bar. That's the good news. The bad news, however, is that the same pressure to investigate and disclose fees associated with 401(k) plans is now coming to plan administrators in a different form ' new Department of Labor (“DOL”) regulations codified at 29 C.F.R. ' 2550.404a-5.

These regulations, which went into effect for plan years beginning on or after Nov. 1, 2011, require robust disclosures to plan participants and beneficiaries. The consequences for failure to comply are severe. First, in a virtually unprecedented move, the DOL has taken the position that an ERISA fiduciary who fails to comply with the regulations has committed a per se breach of his or her fiduciary duties. But it gets worse. While Section 404(c) of ERISA historically has provided fiduciaries with substantial “cover” in the event that a participant makes a bad investment decision in a self-directed retirement plan, failure to comply with the new regulations eliminates that defense ' conceivably putting plan fiduciaries on the hook for the poor investment decisions of plan participants.

Given the complexities associated with regulatory compliance, plan actors are well-advised to act now to ensure that they are prepared to meet the DOL's onerous disclosure burdens. This article is designed to provide a high-level overview of these new regulatory requirements.

Category One: Plan-Related Information

The first category of disclosures that plan administrators will need to provide participants includes information about the general operation of the plan, expenses associated with the administration of the plan, and information about the expenses charged to individual participants' accounts. (To relate all this information, plan administrators will of course need to secure detailed fee disclosures from plan service providers, which those providers have been instructed to produce by no later than April 1, 2012. For an extended discussion of these 408(b)(2) disclosures, see John L. Brown, New Regulations for Service Providers: Retirement Plan Fiduciaries Take Note, Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report (May, 2011).)

In broad strokes, plan administrators must provide participants with the following information:

General Information

Starting with the most general body of disclosures, the DOL requires that plan administrators provide participants with information regarding their ability to give investment instructions; how those instructions are made and any restrictions thereon; how voting and tender rights may be exercised; a listing of designated investment options; the identity of designated investment managers; and a description of any brokerage windows available under the plan. Such information, moreover, must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments. (Notably, for all annual/initial disclosures described herein, the DOL has said that disclosures do not need to be distributed before the later of 60 days after the beginning of the plan year or May 31, 2012.)

Plan Administrative Expenses

Next, plan administrators must provide participants with an explanation of fees and expenses associated with administrative services (such as accounting, legal, and record-keeping services) that are charged to participant accounts, along with an explanation of how such fees and expenses are allocated. Like with the “general information” described above, these disclosures must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments. In addition, participants must receive quarterly statements showing the actual amount charged to their accounts during the preceding quarter. These quarterly statements must be furnished within 45 days after the end of the quarter in which the initial/annual disclosures are required to be provided to participants, which, for calendar year plans, would put the deadline for the first quarterly statements on Aug. 14, 2012. While such statements need not specify the dollar figure that service providers received from designated investment options (such as 12b-1 fees or “revenue sharing”), the statement must at least indicate whether any such expenses were paid in the preceding quarter from one or more such options.

Individual Participant Expenses

In addition to plan administrative expenses, plan administrators must inform participants about any fees or expenses assessed for services rendered on an individual-participant basis (such as loan fees, qualified domestic relation order (“QDRO”) fees, and fees for investment advice). Like the “plan administrative expenses” disclosures, this information must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments, along with a quarterly statement showing the actual amounts charged to an individual participant's account in the preceding quarter.

Category Two: Investment-Related Information

Apart from the plan-related information described above, the DOL also requires that plan administrators provide details regarding particular investment options being offered by the plan. Such information must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments. In addition, investment-related information must be provided in a “comparative” format, such as a chart, so that participants can measure the various investment options side-by-side. (For a “model” chart, go to www.dol.gov/ebsa/participantfeerulemodelchart.doc.)

Among other things, the investment-related disclosures must include the following:

  • The name and category of the relevant investment fund;
  • A website where additional information may be found;
  • For fixed return investments, the annual rate of return and term of the investment;
  • For investments with a variable rate of return, one-, five-, and 10-year performance data (if available) and comparisons to an appropriate benchmark;
  • A description of the fees charged directly to participant accounts;
  • Restrictions on the ability to purchase, transfer, or withdraw from the investment option;
  • The percentage expense-ratio associated with the investment option, along with an illustrative example showing how the total annual expense of the option would affect a $1,000 investment;
  • A statement that fees and expenses are but one of several factors that a participant should consider when making investment decisions, along with a statement that fees and expenses can substantially reduce the growth of a retirement account; and
  • A general glossary of terms (which can be provided via direction to a web address containing such information).

In summary, plan fiduciaries should act now to ensure that: 1) they obtain all necessary service-provider disclosures by the April 1, 2012 deadline; 2) they are prepared to make the first round of initial/annual disclosures by May 31, 2012 or, if later, 60 days after the beginning of the plan year; and 3) they are prepared to distribute quarterly statements within 45 days after the end of the quarter in which the initial/annual disclosures are required to be provided to participants. While the task is herculean, the consequences of failure to comply can be catastrophic for fiduciaries, so time is clearly of the essence.


Edward Marshall is a partner in the Atlanta offices of Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, where he is a member of the firm's Litigation and Employee Benefits Practice Groups. He can be reached at 404-873-8536 or [email protected].

Over the past five years, fiduciaries overseeing 401(k) plans have faced an unwelcome barrage of litigation regarding the fees associated with plan investments and administration. Among other things, the plaintiffs' bar has targeted ERISA fiduciaries with lawsuits alleging that the fees paid to investment managers and service providers were “excessive,” imprudently evaluated, and inadequately disclosed to plan participants. Given the sheer size of certain corporate plans, the liability exposure in class actions making such claims can be frightening, even when the per-participant “loss” flowing from an allegedly imprudent fiduciary decision is relatively miniscule.

Thankfully, smaller plans ' such as those administered by most law firms ' have (to date) received scant attention from the plaintiffs' bar. That's the good news. The bad news, however, is that the same pressure to investigate and disclose fees associated with 401(k) plans is now coming to plan administrators in a different form ' new Department of Labor (“DOL”) regulations codified at 29 C.F.R. ' 2550.404a-5.

These regulations, which went into effect for plan years beginning on or after Nov. 1, 2011, require robust disclosures to plan participants and beneficiaries. The consequences for failure to comply are severe. First, in a virtually unprecedented move, the DOL has taken the position that an ERISA fiduciary who fails to comply with the regulations has committed a per se breach of his or her fiduciary duties. But it gets worse. While Section 404(c) of ERISA historically has provided fiduciaries with substantial “cover” in the event that a participant makes a bad investment decision in a self-directed retirement plan, failure to comply with the new regulations eliminates that defense ' conceivably putting plan fiduciaries on the hook for the poor investment decisions of plan participants.

Given the complexities associated with regulatory compliance, plan actors are well-advised to act now to ensure that they are prepared to meet the DOL's onerous disclosure burdens. This article is designed to provide a high-level overview of these new regulatory requirements.

Category One: Plan-Related Information

The first category of disclosures that plan administrators will need to provide participants includes information about the general operation of the plan, expenses associated with the administration of the plan, and information about the expenses charged to individual participants' accounts. (To relate all this information, plan administrators will of course need to secure detailed fee disclosures from plan service providers, which those providers have been instructed to produce by no later than April 1, 2012. For an extended discussion of these 408(b)(2) disclosures, see John L. Brown, New Regulations for Service Providers: Retirement Plan Fiduciaries Take Note, Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report (May, 2011).)

In broad strokes, plan administrators must provide participants with the following information:

General Information

Starting with the most general body of disclosures, the DOL requires that plan administrators provide participants with information regarding their ability to give investment instructions; how those instructions are made and any restrictions thereon; how voting and tender rights may be exercised; a listing of designated investment options; the identity of designated investment managers; and a description of any brokerage windows available under the plan. Such information, moreover, must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments. (Notably, for all annual/initial disclosures described herein, the DOL has said that disclosures do not need to be distributed before the later of 60 days after the beginning of the plan year or May 31, 2012.)

Plan Administrative Expenses

Next, plan administrators must provide participants with an explanation of fees and expenses associated with administrative services (such as accounting, legal, and record-keeping services) that are charged to participant accounts, along with an explanation of how such fees and expenses are allocated. Like with the “general information” described above, these disclosures must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments. In addition, participants must receive quarterly statements showing the actual amount charged to their accounts during the preceding quarter. These quarterly statements must be furnished within 45 days after the end of the quarter in which the initial/annual disclosures are required to be provided to participants, which, for calendar year plans, would put the deadline for the first quarterly statements on Aug. 14, 2012. While such statements need not specify the dollar figure that service providers received from designated investment options (such as 12b-1 fees or “revenue sharing”), the statement must at least indicate whether any such expenses were paid in the preceding quarter from one or more such options.

Individual Participant Expenses

In addition to plan administrative expenses, plan administrators must inform participants about any fees or expenses assessed for services rendered on an individual-participant basis (such as loan fees, qualified domestic relation order (“QDRO”) fees, and fees for investment advice). Like the “plan administrative expenses” disclosures, this information must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments, along with a quarterly statement showing the actual amounts charged to an individual participant's account in the preceding quarter.

Category Two: Investment-Related Information

Apart from the plan-related information described above, the DOL also requires that plan administrators provide details regarding particular investment options being offered by the plan. Such information must be provided annually, beginning on or before the date on which participants can first direct their investments. In addition, investment-related information must be provided in a “comparative” format, such as a chart, so that participants can measure the various investment options side-by-side. (For a “model” chart, go to www.dol.gov/ebsa/participantfeerulemodelchart.doc.)

Among other things, the investment-related disclosures must include the following:

  • The name and category of the relevant investment fund;
  • A website where additional information may be found;
  • For fixed return investments, the annual rate of return and term of the investment;
  • For investments with a variable rate of return, one-, five-, and 10-year performance data (if available) and comparisons to an appropriate benchmark;
  • A description of the fees charged directly to participant accounts;
  • Restrictions on the ability to purchase, transfer, or withdraw from the investment option;
  • The percentage expense-ratio associated with the investment option, along with an illustrative example showing how the total annual expense of the option would affect a $1,000 investment;
  • A statement that fees and expenses are but one of several factors that a participant should consider when making investment decisions, along with a statement that fees and expenses can substantially reduce the growth of a retirement account; and
  • A general glossary of terms (which can be provided via direction to a web address containing such information).

In summary, plan fiduciaries should act now to ensure that: 1) they obtain all necessary service-provider disclosures by the April 1, 2012 deadline; 2) they are prepared to make the first round of initial/annual disclosures by May 31, 2012 or, if later, 60 days after the beginning of the plan year; and 3) they are prepared to distribute quarterly statements within 45 days after the end of the quarter in which the initial/annual disclosures are required to be provided to participants. While the task is herculean, the consequences of failure to comply can be catastrophic for fiduciaries, so time is clearly of the essence.


Edward Marshall is a partner in the Atlanta offices of Arnall Golden Gregory LLP, where he is a member of the firm's Litigation and Employee Benefits Practice Groups. He can be reached at 404-873-8536 or [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.