Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An article in the November 2011 issue of Entertainment Law & Finance reported on oral arguments before the U.S Supreme Court in Golan v. Holder, a case involving U.S. copyright restoration for foreign works. Section 514, referred to in the article, is from the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, enacted as part of the United States' obligations under the international Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Section 514 is encapsulated in '104A of the U.S. Copyright Act.
An article in the November 2011 issue of Entertainment Law & Finance reported on oral arguments before the U.S Supreme Court in Golan v. Holder, a case involving U.S. copyright restoration for foreign works. Section 514, referred to in the article, is from the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, enacted as part of the United States' obligations under the international Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Section 514 is encapsulated in '104A of the U.S. Copyright Act.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?