Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The limitations period for the filing of claims under the “Vaccine Act” has kept many from recovering for vaccine-related injuries. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. ” 300aa-1 to -34 (Vaccine Act), allows a 36-month window from the time a vaccine-related injury manifests itself to the time of filing. Any claim made after that is barred by the relevant statute of limitations. 42 U.S.C. ' 300aa-16(a)(2).
Still, claimants try to stretch the boundaries, offering varying reasons for why their cases should not be time-barred. Recently, in one such case, Cloer v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 16449 (Fed. Cir. 9/5/11), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed a Federal Circuit panel decision and found against a woman who had won the right to pursue her claim. That case, while foreclosing the claimant's right to seek redress, also contained the reversal of a precedent set 10 years earlier in Brice v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 240 F.3d 1367 (Fed. Cir. 2001). The Brice holding had precluded application of the doctrine of equitable tolling in Vaccine Act cases. Going forward, that rule is not necessarily a bar to late filing, though access to the courts for tardy claimants will remain very limited.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.