Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

<B><I>BREAKING NEWS:</b></i> <b>Facebook Settles with FTC over Privacy Violations</b>

By Jenna Greene
November 30, 2011

Facebook has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived its users and failed to keep their information private, agreeing on Nov. 29 to establish a comprehensive privacy program that includes independent audits for the next 20 years.

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated the FTC Act, which bars unfair and deceptive conduct, by falsely promising consumers that their information would be kept private. “On numerous occasions, Facebook violated its privacy commitments to hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz in a conference call with reporters.

For example, the FTC alleged that Facebook changed its Web site in December 2009 so that previously private information, such as friend lists, were made public without warning users in advance or seeking their approval. Facebook also failed to reveal that third-party apps could access nearly all of users' personal data. Facebook also promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers, but did so nonetheless. The company also claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had quit.

The settlement bars Facebook from making any further deceptive privacy claims, requires that the company get consumers' approval before it changes the way it shares their data, and requires that it obtain periodic assessments of its privacy practices by independent, third-party auditors for the next 20 years.

There are no monetary penalties ' the FTC does not have authority under the FTC Act to fine companies for violations. But if Facebook doesn't honor the deal, the company is on the hook for $16,000 per violation per day.

The consent decree also includes no admission of wrongdoing, although FTC founder Mark Zuckerberg in his blog acknowledged that “we've made a bunch of mistakes. In particular, I think that a small number of high profile mistakes, like Beacon four years ago and poor execution as we transitioned our privacy model two years ago, have often overshadowed much of the good work we've done.”

He continued, “Even before the agreement announced by the FTC today, Facebook had already proactively addressed many of the concerns the FTC raised.”

Zuckerberg announced the creation of two new corporate offices, naming Erin Egan, who was previously co-chairwoman of the global privacy and data security practice of Covington & Burling, as chief privacy officer for policy. Michael Richter will become chief privacy officer for products. He's currently Facebook's chief privacy counsel on the legal team.

In the FTC case, Facebook was represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners S. Ashlie Beringer and M. Sean Royall and general counsel Theodore Ullyot.


Jenna Greene writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].

Facebook has settled Federal Trade Commission charges that it deceived its users and failed to keep their information private, agreeing on Nov. 29 to establish a comprehensive privacy program that includes independent audits for the next 20 years.

The FTC alleged that Facebook violated the FTC Act, which bars unfair and deceptive conduct, by falsely promising consumers that their information would be kept private. “On numerous occasions, Facebook violated its privacy commitments to hundreds of millions of users,” said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz in a conference call with reporters.

For example, the FTC alleged that Facebook changed its Web site in December 2009 so that previously private information, such as friend lists, were made public without warning users in advance or seeking their approval. Facebook also failed to reveal that third-party apps could access nearly all of users' personal data. Facebook also promised users that it would not share their personal information with advertisers, but did so nonetheless. The company also claimed that when users deactivated or deleted their accounts, their photos and videos would be inaccessible. But Facebook allowed access to the content, even after users had quit.

The settlement bars Facebook from making any further deceptive privacy claims, requires that the company get consumers' approval before it changes the way it shares their data, and requires that it obtain periodic assessments of its privacy practices by independent, third-party auditors for the next 20 years.

There are no monetary penalties ' the FTC does not have authority under the FTC Act to fine companies for violations. But if Facebook doesn't honor the deal, the company is on the hook for $16,000 per violation per day.

The consent decree also includes no admission of wrongdoing, although FTC founder Mark Zuckerberg in his blog acknowledged that “we've made a bunch of mistakes. In particular, I think that a small number of high profile mistakes, like Beacon four years ago and poor execution as we transitioned our privacy model two years ago, have often overshadowed much of the good work we've done.”

He continued, “Even before the agreement announced by the FTC today, Facebook had already proactively addressed many of the concerns the FTC raised.”

Zuckerberg announced the creation of two new corporate offices, naming Erin Egan, who was previously co-chairwoman of the global privacy and data security practice of Covington & Burling, as chief privacy officer for policy. Michael Richter will become chief privacy officer for products. He's currently Facebook's chief privacy counsel on the legal team.

In the FTC case, Facebook was represented by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher partners S. Ashlie Beringer and M. Sean Royall and general counsel Theodore Ullyot.


Jenna Greene writes for The National Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy. She can be contacted at [email protected].

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.