Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
With Americans spending nearly a quarter of their time on social media websites and new social media sites, like Google Buzz, which already accumulated more than 25 million users before even launching, it is no surprise that social media is changing the way we litigate. Both in-house and outside counsel can use social media to investigate opposing parties, potential witnesses and even jurors. In addition, corporate counsel face the unique challenges of having to determine when the use of social media at or after work violates company policies and may even amount to a crime. A growing number of sanctions cases place as much burden on in-house as outside counsel, forcing corporate counsel to become experts in this emerging area of technology that is not only changing workplace norms, but also the way they litigate.
New Ethical Dilemmas
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.