Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This article addresses a growing trend in bankruptcy sales whereby purchasers decline to effectuate an asset purchase under Bankruptcy Code ' 363, and instead, acquire the debtor's stock by sponsoring a reorganization plan designed to preserve valuable tax attributes. Generally, as an alternative to effectuating an asset purchase under Bankruptcy Code ' 363, a reorganization plan permits certain qualified creditors to acquire the stock in a reorganized debtor in exchange for satisfaction of their prepetition claims and an additional cash infusion. The alternative reorganization plan enables the reorganized debtor to avoid a limitation on the ability to use previously generated net operating losses (“NOLs”) under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Tax Code”), and, thereby, preserve the debtor's previously generated NOLs which may offset future taxable income. The transaction structure typically includes a winning cash bid for a contingent sale of substantially all of the assets by a qualified creditor. The contingent asset sale is effectuated only in the event the qualified creditor is unable to sponsor a reorganization plan under which the qualified creditor acquires a majority of the common stock of the reorganized debtor. The transaction combines the certainty of a Bankruptcy Code ' 363 “cash for assets sale” with the potential for increased recovery due to the additional value associated with the preservation of NOLs (in the event the contingent asset sale is not consummated and the alternative plan of reorganization is approved).
Brief Primer on Net Operating Losses and Tax Code Section 382
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.