Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Nov. 14, 1988, the Honorable Gerald E. Delaney of the N.Y. Supreme Court, Westchester County, released a decision that limited the utility of the New York Franchise Law's isolated sales exemption. His decision in The National Survival Game of New York, Inc. v. NSG of LI Corp. (200 N.Y.L.J. No. 93, p. 27; CCH Business Franchise Guide ' 9294, at 19,622) remains the law in New York. But did Justice Delaney get it right?
Franchise sales in the United States are regulated by both federal and state law. The federal FTC Franchise Rule requires franchisors to provide prospective franchisees with a copy of a disclosure document before taking any money or signing any agreement. Fifteen states also regulate the sale of franchises, and some of these states have both a registration requirement and their own disclosure document requirement. New York is one of these states. But the franchise statute in New York, as well as Indiana, Minnesota, and Washington, provides an exception for isolated franchise sales.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.