Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Talking to patent examiners often helps advance the examination of a patent application. Now data from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“Patent Office”) show that by talking to a patent examiner prior to a first official action, an applicant is three times more likely to get a first action allowance of a patent application. A newly expanded Patent Office program makes it easier to talk to the examiner prior to initial examination. (“Full First Action Interview Pilot Program,” Kappos, David J., Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, May 6, 2011). The heart of the program is an “Examiner Interview” that takes place before the examiner issues a first official action, which allows the examiner and patent applicant to discuss the application, identify allowable patent claims, and shave months or years off of the time from filing of an application to receipt of an issued patent.
The new program, officially called the Full First Action Interview Pilot Program, is not entirely new. The First Action Interview Pilot Program began in April 2008, and this initial program transitioned into the Enhanced First Action Interview Pilot Program in October 2009. Those programs were limited to patent applications in specifically identified technologies, or “art units,” within the Patent Office (those art units are identified on the Enhanced First Action Interview Program website at www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/faipp_enhanced.jsp#heading-2). Under the new full program, patent applications in all art units are eligible, provided that the applications meet other specific requirements. Unlike the previous interview pilot programs, the full program does not limit eligibility to patent applications filed before a specific date. The full program, however, remains a pilot program and is scheduled to continue only until May 16, 2012. The one-year period will give the Patent Office time to collect more data on the benefits of the full program.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.