Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, denied a Texas-based concert promoter's motion to dismiss a suit by an Argentinian promoter over a planned M'tley Cre concert. Vigo v. Gabe Reed Productions, 3:11-CV-2044-G. In Dec. 2010 and Jan. 2011, Ariel Vigo allegedly negotiated an oral agreement with Dallas-based promoter Gabe Reed for a Spring 2011 M'tley Cre show to be performed in Buenos Aires. Vigo claims he promised he would pay a $300,000 guarantee and a percentage of net revenues, but the show didn't take place. The Argentinian promoter sued Reed for breach of oral contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.
Denying Reed's motion to dismiss any of Vigo's causes of action, Senior District Judge A. Joe Fish noted: “Vigo has pled a breach of contract claim against Reed. First, he has pled that there was an oral contract, made by e-mail and in person discussions throughout December 2010 and January 2011. Second, Vigo has pled performance by stating that he sent Reed a $150,000 deposit. Third, Vigo has pled that Reed breached the oral contract by not getting Motley Crue to perform for Vigo in Buenos Aires. Finally, Vigo has pled that he sustained damages, consisting of the unreturned deposit and lost profits.”
In addition, to establish a claim of fraud in Texas, a plaintiff must show: a false material misrepresentation, which a defendant made either knowing it was false or without knowledge of its truth; with the intent that the plaintiff act on the misrepresentation, which the plaintiff did to his or her detriment. On Vigo's fraud claim, District Judge Fish found: “Vigo has pled that Reed made a false material representation ' that Motley Crue would perform a live musical performance for Vigo in Buenos Aires between March and May 2011. Vigo has also pled Reed's mental state, both with respect to the truth of the statement and the intent behind making it. The facts generally pled by Vigo, concerning the alleged conversations and Vigo's reliance on Reed's statements, support the plausible conclusion that Reed had the necessary mental state. Finally, Vigo has pled both reliance and injury on the alleged misrepresentations, by stating that he sent Reed the $150,000 deposit.”
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, denied a Texas-based concert promoter's motion to dismiss a suit by an Argentinian promoter over a planned M'tley Cre concert. Vigo v. Gabe Reed Productions, 3:11-CV-2044-G. In Dec. 2010 and Jan. 2011, Ariel Vigo allegedly negotiated an oral agreement with Dallas-based promoter Gabe Reed for a Spring 2011 M'tley Cre show to be performed in Buenos Aires. Vigo claims he promised he would pay a $300,000 guarantee and a percentage of net revenues, but the show didn't take place. The Argentinian promoter sued Reed for breach of oral contract, fraud, negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment.
Denying Reed's motion to dismiss any of Vigo's causes of action, Senior District Judge
In addition, to establish a claim of fraud in Texas, a plaintiff must show: a false material misrepresentation, which a defendant made either knowing it was false or without knowledge of its truth; with the intent that the plaintiff act on the misrepresentation, which the plaintiff did to his or her detriment. On Vigo's fraud claim, District Judge Fish found: “Vigo has pled that Reed made a false material representation ' that Motley Crue would perform a live musical performance for Vigo in Buenos Aires between March and May 2011. Vigo has also pled Reed's mental state, both with respect to the truth of the statement and the intent behind making it. The facts generally pled by Vigo, concerning the alleged conversations and Vigo's reliance on Reed's statements, support the plausible conclusion that Reed had the necessary mental state. Finally, Vigo has pled both reliance and injury on the alleged misrepresentations, by stating that he sent Reed the $150,000 deposit.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.