Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Large corporate Chapter 11 debtors often realize value by divesting assets under ' 363 of the Bankruptcy Code as part of their development and negotiation of a Chapter 11 plan pursuant to which the proceeds of such sales will be distributed. When a debtor's ability to propose a plan of reorganization outpaces its sale efforts, there may be pressure to confirm the plan before the asset sales are completed. In such circumstances, bankruptcy courts have preserved the debtor's ability to dispose of assets pursuant to ' 363 of the Bankruptcy Code following confirmation and even the effectiveness of a Chapter 11 plan.
It is easy to understand why debtors and purchasers would want to preserve the estate's ability to sell assets pursuant to ' 363 following confirmation of a Chapter 11 plan. Section 363 offers numerous benefits that are attractive to debtors and purchasers. Under ' 363(f), assets can be sold free and clear of interests ' presumably including interests existing as of the date of the order approving the sale or the closing of the sale. Appeals of orders authorizing the good-faith sale of property may be mooted under ' 363(m). And the time required to complete a sale pursuant to ' 363 could be significantly shorter than the time required to solicit a plan, which otherwise could be required if the assets to be sold are material to plan recoveries. In some instances, the debtor may even be able to obtain an injunction prohibiting creditors from pursuing claims related to the assets against the purchaser.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.