Account

Sign in to access your account and subscription

S.D.N.Y. Endorses Commonly Used Procedures for Providing Adequate Assurance to Utility Providers

At least one United States District Court has approved of specific procedures to adequately assure utility providers of payment following a bankruptcy filing.

6 minute read January 30, 2012 at 10:48 AM
By
Joel H. Levitin And Richard A. Stieglitz JR.
S.D.N.Y. Endorses Commonly Used Procedures for Providing Adequate Assurance to Utility Providers

When Congress passed the BAPCPA amendments in 2005, it became clear that a debtor's satisfactory prior payment history and the provision of an administrative claim to utility providers for post-petition utility services would no longer be sufficient to satisfy the debtor's requirement to provide “adequate assurance of payment” under Bankruptcy Code ' 366, so as to preclude termination of such services in bankruptcy.

This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only

ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN The Bankruptcy Strategist

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

Already have an account? Sign In Now

For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.

NOT FOR REPRINT

© 2026 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.

Continue Reading

AI claims are getting more scrutiny and regulators are looking more closely at whether organizations can substantiate what they say their AI does, while courts are beginning to address what happens when AI-generated search summaries get information wrong.

November 01, 2026

This is the second in a two-part series on AI-driven crises. Part 1 examined communications during an incident while the facts are still developing. Part 2 addresses crisis plans, governance and tabletop exercises before an agent acts on behalf of the business.

November 01, 2026