Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Courts Must Report Convictions Connected to Domestic Violence
The state legislature has directed the courts to flag misdemeanor convictions involving domestic violence, the latest among several kinds of data legislators demand from the judiciary. Consequently, since Nov. 29, 2011, information about four offenses has been funneled to the National Instant Background Check System, a federally administered program created under the Brady Handgun Prevention Act to discourage people convicted of violent crimes from buying guns.
Amy Barasch, the executive director of the New York state Office for the Prevention of Domestic Violence, said the presence of a gun in a household where domestic violence occurs increases the chances of fatalities by six times. “This new law will help us ensure that the federal prohibition against qualifying misdemeanor domestic violence offenders' eligibility to access a firearm is strongly enforced,” Ms. Barasch said.
Administrative Headache?
The judiciary already reports to the governor and the legislature information about foreclosures, criminal caseloads, the composition of jury pools and other issues. The latest requirement comes at a time when
layoffs and early retirements have left fewer people available to compile such data. “Anything extra that is given to us, 'burden' is not the word, but it does stretch our resources,” said Justice Fern A. Fisher, administrative judge for the courts in New York City. “We will comply with it.”
Warwick Town Court Justice Peter D. Barlet, the head of the New York State Magistrates Association, said he is worried that another reporting requirement will create problems for some town and village court justices, especially, those without adequate staff. There are about 2,100 town and village justices in 1,750 courts around the state. Mr. Barlet said that the crimes to be reported to the state are an “everyday” occurrence in those communities. “I would say that taken singularly, this is probably something we could handle,” Mr. Barlet said. “But it seems like any additional reporting requirements for us could be burdensome.”
Judge Melissa Jackson the supervising judge for Manhattan Criminal Court, said she believes her court could properly identify or “stamp” cases involving domestic violence without undue burden. “I don't think there is anybody who doesn't understand what a domestic violence case is,” Judge Jackson said. “The only thing that has broadened with recent changes is what the definition[s] of 'intimate relationships' are.”
What Is Being Reported Under the New Directive?
Offenses covered by the new reporting system are third-degree assault (PL 120.00); criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation (PL 121.11); second-degree menacing (PL 120.14); and forcible touching (PL 130.52). According to the state Division of Criminal Justice Services, about 8,600 convictions for those crimes occurred as of Nov. 22, 2011. But the division does not know how many of those cases involved domestic violence.
The new statute defines potential victims of domestic violence as members of the same “family or household” as spelled out under CPL.530.11(1). They include married couples, formerly married couples, people with a child in common, people who have never been married but who have had an “intimate relationship,” and people who have lived together previously.
Under the new procedures, local district attorneys are to notify defendants within 45 days of their arraignments that they have been identified as having committed a domestic violence crime. Upon conviction for one of the offenses enumerated in the law, they would be offered a hearing. Judge Jackson said she expects most defendants would not choose to have hearings.
Court clerks will send the information to the Division of Criminal Justice Services, which will forward it to the FBI. The notification will allow the FBI to deny the purchase of a gun “without further research.”
The reporting requirement was approved by the Legislature and governor earlier this year as A698/S4424. It was sponsored by Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, D-Scarsdale, and Senator Stephen M. Saland, R-Poughkeepsie.
Joel Stashenko is a reporter with the New York Law Journal, an ALM sister publication of this newsletter in which this article also appeared. He may be contacted at [email protected].
The state legislature has directed the courts to flag misdemeanor convictions involving domestic violence, the latest among several kinds of data legislators demand from the judiciary. Consequently, since Nov. 29, 2011, information about four offenses has been funneled to the National Instant Background Check System, a federally administered program created under the Brady Handgun Prevention Act to discourage people convicted of violent crimes from buying guns.
Amy Barasch, the executive director of the
Administrative Headache?
The judiciary already reports to the governor and the legislature information about foreclosures, criminal caseloads, the composition of jury pools and other issues. The latest requirement comes at a time when
layoffs and early retirements have left fewer people available to compile such data. “Anything extra that is given to us, 'burden' is not the word, but it does stretch our resources,” said Justice Fern A. Fisher, administrative judge for the courts in
Warwick Town Court Justice Peter D. Barlet, the head of the
Judge Melissa Jackson the supervising judge for Manhattan Criminal Court, said she believes her court could properly identify or “stamp” cases involving domestic violence without undue burden. “I don't think there is anybody who doesn't understand what a domestic violence case is,” Judge Jackson said. “The only thing that has broadened with recent changes is what the definition[s] of 'intimate relationships' are.”
What Is Being Reported Under the New Directive?
Offenses covered by the new reporting system are third-degree assault (PL 120.00); criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation (PL 121.11); second-degree menacing (PL 120.14); and forcible touching (PL 130.52). According to the state Division of Criminal Justice Services, about 8,600 convictions for those crimes occurred as of Nov. 22, 2011. But the division does not know how many of those cases involved domestic violence.
The new statute defines potential victims of domestic violence as members of the same “family or household” as spelled out under CPL.530.11(1). They include married couples, formerly married couples, people with a child in common, people who have never been married but who have had an “intimate relationship,” and people who have lived together previously.
Under the new procedures, local district attorneys are to notify defendants within 45 days of their arraignments that they have been identified as having committed a domestic violence crime. Upon conviction for one of the offenses enumerated in the law, they would be offered a hearing. Judge Jackson said she expects most defendants would not choose to have hearings.
Court clerks will send the information to the Division of Criminal Justice Services, which will forward it to the FBI. The notification will allow the FBI to deny the purchase of a gun “without further research.”
The reporting requirement was approved by the Legislature and governor earlier this year as A698/S4424. It was sponsored by Assemblywoman Amy Paulin, D-Scarsdale, and Senator Stephen M. Saland, R-Poughkeepsie.
Joel Stashenko is a reporter with the
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Stranger to the Deed Rule
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.