Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Drug & Device News

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
January 31, 2012

Bill Seeks Greater Oversight of Some Devices

On Dec. 14, 2011, Senators Charles Grassley (R-IA), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) and Herb Kohl (D-WI) introduced legislation in the U.S. Senate that would increase U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oversight of some medical implant products. If passed, the Medical Device Patient Safety Act would permit the FDA to better monitor the safety of implanted medical devices by requiring manufacturers to agree to collect post-market safety data as a condition of approval to market their devices to the public. While this type of data is currently required only of manufacturers of the highest-risk devices ' those that have been approved through the rigorous Pre-market Approval (PMA) process ' the new legislation would extend the agency's post-market surveillance powers to cover devices that have entered the market under the 510(k) system. (A device cleared under the 510(k) system must be shown to be substantially equivalent to a product already on the market, but it is not itself approved by the FDA as a safe product.) As part of their impetus for introducing the bill, its authors cited to concerns raised by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) when it placed the FDA on its “high risk list” (see www.gao.gov/highrisk/risks/safety-security/public_health.php), as well as to the case of the DePuy hip implant, which was recalled only after the FDA and the manufacturer learned through foreign registries that patients were experiencing problems with the device. If the bill becomes law, manufacturers failing to conduct required post-market monitoring of their product's safety could find their permission to sell rescinded.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes Image

“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.