Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Medical Malpractice Law & StrategyLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Limiting Windfall Damages

By David Axelrad and Robert Wright
January 31, 2012

As many consumers of medical care can attest, a medical provider's “usual and customary” rates as shown on its invoices are often several times higher than the amount the provider agrees to accept as payment in full from health insurers and others. In Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions Inc., 52 Cal. 4th 541 (2011), the California Supreme Court recently decided a recurring issue concerning such damages in personal injury cases: whether the plaintiff can recover as damages the undiscounted “usual and customary” rates that medical providers bill for the plaintiff's medical care, or only the discounted amounts that providers accept as full payment for that care. The Supreme Court held the plaintiff may recover only the discounted amount, stating that the plaintiff “may recover as economic damages no more than the amounts paid by the plaintiff or his or her insurer for the medical services received ' .” Id. at 566 (emphasis added).

Howell was one of 2011's most important damages cases. It will have a significant impact on personal injury damages in California and may offer a model for challenging windfall damages in other states. Yet it leaves unanswered numerous questions that are likely to challenge the appellate courts in 2012 and beyond.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.