Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Limiting Windfall Damages
As many consumers of medical care can attest, a medical provider's “usual and customary” rates as shown on its invoices are often several times higher than the amount the provider agrees to accept as payment in full from health insurers and others. In Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions Inc., 52 Cal. 4th 541 (2011), the California Supreme Court recently decided a recurring issue concerning such damages in personal injury cases: whether the plaintiff can recover as damages the undiscounted “usual and customary” rates that medical providers bill for the plaintiff's medical care, or only the discounted amounts that providers accept as full payment for that care. The Supreme Court held the plaintiff may recover only the discounted amount, stating that the plaintiff “may recover as economic damages no more than the amounts paid by the plaintiff or his or her insurer for the medical services received ' .” Id. at 566 (emphasis added).
Howell was one of 2011's most important damages cases. It will have a significant impact on personal injury damages in California and may offer a model for challenging windfall damages in other states. Yet it leaves unanswered numerous questions that are likely to challenge the appellate courts in 2012 and beyond.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.