Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Stolen Patient Records Prompt Lawsuit
A proposed class action suit has been filed against the University of California at Los Angeles Health System claiming breach of California's patient privacy law, known as the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act. Each of the 16,000 patients whose records were stolen in September 2011 from the home of a physician formerly with the UCLA Health System has the potential to recover $1,000 in damages. UCLA informed patients of the privacy breach on Nov. 4, 2011, assuring them that their Social Security numbers were not included in the stolen records. Names, birth dates and addresses were obtained, however. The plaintiffs are represented by the Los Angeles firms Kabateck Brown Kellner and The Ball Law Firm. Attorney Brian Kabateck explained the case: “Our argument is, at this point, why in the world did this doctor have this in the first place? Why was he carrying it around? Why did he take it home?” Kabateck said. “The statue was designed specifically to tell and instruct medical providers. 'You've got a heightened standard. You've got to do more than treat it like information at a company that sells copy machines.' It's not a customer list. It's critical confidential patient information.”
Stolen Patient Records Prompt Lawsuit
A proposed class action suit has been filed against the University of California at Los Angeles Health System claiming breach of California's patient privacy law, known as the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act. Each of the 16,000 patients whose records were stolen in September 2011 from the home of a physician formerly with the UCLA Health System has the potential to recover $1,000 in damages. UCLA informed patients of the privacy breach on Nov. 4, 2011, assuring them that their Social Security numbers were not included in the stolen records. Names, birth dates and addresses were obtained, however. The plaintiffs are represented by the Los Angeles firms
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?