Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The sun has set on the collective Sunrise periods in the race to acquire .XXX domain names. Sun-up on Nov. 8, however, shed new light on a seemingly boundless landscape of .XXX domain name possibilities. The dawn of the wild, wild West of .XXX domain name acquisition, a trail first blazed by a red light Landrush between Nov. 8 and Nov. 25, 2011, where the sole prerequisite for Applicants was a membership in the adult Sponsored Community (namely, individuals, companies and organizations who “provide talent, products or services to the adult industry”) (www.icmregistry.com/about). Demonstrated members were not required to be trademark owners or exhibit pre-existing ownership rights or even be first in line for the domain (www.icmregistry.com/launch/plan/#landrush_rules). While domains with lone Applicants were set to be automatically allocated at the close of Landrush, unlike the prior periods in the launch, competing Applicants participated in a closed auction at the end of the period.
As the dust settled following the close of Landrush, however, the last (and potentially most contentious) leg of the launch commenced. General availability began on Dec. 6, and .XXX domains are being allocated on a first come basis; no requirements for pre-existing rights or adult community memberships apply (www.icmregistry.com/launch/plan/#general_aval). Now is the time for trademark, domain name and brand owners to purchase .XXX domains to proactively race to stake a claim in their brand if only as a defensive measure to prevent other domain owners from registering/using their name in a .XXX context. It's a showdown at the .XXX corral.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.