Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Supreme Court recently held in Hosanna-Tabor v. EEOC that the First Amendment's religion clauses provide for a “ministerial exception.” In doing so, the Court promoted religious autonomy at the expense of ministers' rights and society's interest in eradicating discrimination. The Court held that ministers cannot bring employment discrimination suits to challenge adverse employment actions taken by the religious organizations they serve.
However, the Court's narrow and somewhat vague holding left the ministerial exception's reach and significance unclear. Important issues remain undecided, such as which employees are covered by the exception.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.