Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Employment Law StrategistKickerFeaturesTopicsRegulationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Advising a Whistleblower After Dodd-Frank

By Tammy Marzigliano and Jordan A. Thomas
March 27, 2012

On July 21, 2010, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the most significant financial reform effort since the Great Depression. 17 CFR ' 240.21F-1, et seq. Part of that legislation directed the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to establish a whistleblower program that pays monetary rewards to eligible whistleblowers, and prohibits work-place retaliation by employers against whistleblowers. The program arose in response to a long series of corporate scandals that defrauded countless investors and shook investor confidence. To become eligible for the monetary reward, the whistleblower must voluntarily provide the SEC with original information about a violation of the federal securities laws that leads to a successful enforcement action in which the SEC obtains monetary sanctions over $1 million. Whistleblowers who provide such information are eligible for an award of 10% to 30% of the monetary sanctions.

The potential for this type of monetary reward is revolutionary in securities enforcement, and since the enactment of the whistleblower program, the offer of monetary rewards has garnered the lions share of attention from commentators. But the robust anti-retaliation provisions contained in the guidelines are just as ground-breaking and equally important. These provisions prohibit employers from retaliating against individuals who provide the SEC with information about possible federal securities law violations, and victims of such retaliation are granted an independent cause of action with significant potential remedies. In addition, whistleblowers are permitted to report securities violations anonymously if they are represented by counsel.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.