Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Preparing and negotiating sublease agreements can be much more difficult than preparing and negotiating lease agreements. This is especially true with respect to so-called “boilerplate” provisions. Boilerplate provisions are those that do not contain basic/economic terms (such as square footage, term and rent) and include provisions regarding maintenance, repairs, replacements, interruptions in services, assignment/subletting and casualty.
Attorneys frequently do not pay much attention to boilerplate provisions in leases, and this is particularly true with subleases. This can lead to major problems after the sublease is executed, considering that subleases involve three parties and three documents (namely, the sublease, the master lease between the sublandlord and the landlord, and the document containing the landlord”s consent to the sublease). As a matter of law, as between the subtenant and the landlord, there is no privity of contract (although there is privity of estate). This means that there is no contractual arrangement between the subtenant and the landlord and, therefore, the subtenant must look to the sublandlord to provide (or cause the landlord to provide) utilities and other services and to exercise rights and remedies against the landlord on the subtenant”s behalf. Most landlords go out of their way to make it abundantly clear ” usually in the landlord”s consent document ” that there is no privity of contract with the subtenant.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.