Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Public Corruption Prosecutions in New York
The Supreme Court's decision in Skilling v. United States, 561 U.S. ___ (2010), in which the Court limited the federal honest services mail fraud doctrine to cases involving bribes and kickbacks, dealt the federal government a setback. For years, the Justice Department (DOJ) had delved into local public corruption matters under the guise of protecting the citizenry from schemes designed to deprive them of the faithfulness of their officials. Whereas earlier honest services prosecutions tackled undisclosed self-dealing in public contracts and other secret financial interests that did not necessarily rise to the level of quid pro quo bribery, Skilling ensures that the federal government will now be as circumscribed as state prosecutors have been, limited to actual bribery and kickbacks.
In other words, to prosecute state actors for bribery, the government now needs to live, essentially, by state rules. The contours of the Skilling decision are beyond the scope of this article, which will focus instead on the example of New York State and the prosecution of public corruption offenses under that state's law. Although federal and state prosecutors in New York who wish to prosecute state and local officials after Skilling are now on similar footing with respect to bribery, New York prosecutors have several additional tools in their arsenal. A case in point is the recent prosecution of former New York State comptroller Alan Hevesi, discussed below, in which then Attorney General Andrew Cuomo effectively used a statute other than bribery to prosecute public corruption.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.