Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Like everyone, doctors and other medical care providers are deeply concerned about their professional reputations. Allegations of medical malpractice, whether completely unfounded or based on solid evidence, can damage a medical practice, or lead a care provider's other patients to question the care they have received in the past. Whenever possible, damage control is desirable when a medical professional stands accused of providing substandard care.
To preserve reputations, settlement agreements often contain clauses emphasizing that, although the parties are settling, the medical professional has not admitted any wrongdoing. In the same vein, attorneys representing medical clients routinely press the opposing side to preserve confidentiality. Complainants may agree not to disclose the details of their alleged injuries, or the amounts they received to conclude the case. Such confidentiality clauses often come at a higher settlement cost to the medical provider, but their value to a practitioner's reputation going forward may be considerable; that is, unless the bargained-for secrecy pact cannot be enforced.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.