Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Internet Law & StrategyLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Analyzing Novel Issues in Internet Jurisdiction

By Richard Raysman and Peter Brown
March 30, 2012

The ubiquity of the Internet and the ease with which copyrighted material can be widely distributed across boundaries have created novel issues regarding personal jurisdiction. In recent years, accused infringers have challenged the jurisdictional reach of federal courts in disputes over online file-sharing and copyright infringement and raised dynamic legal issues that compel courts to balance the right to seek redress against the principle of judicial fairness. For example, if a party infringes a work produced by a publisher located in one state, but the copying and distribution occurred on computers located in two other states, where did the “infringement” occur for purposes of personal jurisdiction? Moreover, can a copyright holder sue in a single forum hundreds of geographically diverse individuals accused of downloading a copyrighted movie simply because the defendants participated in a single BitTorrent “swarm”?

This article discusses jurisdictional issues involving online copyright infringement, as well as the emerging issues surrounding disputes involving BitTorrent file-sharing technology.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.