Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
According to the federal government, while the act of gathering evidence creates a direct conflict between competing interests, the interest in disclosing the fraud generally outweighs the defendant's interest in keeping the fraud from being divulged. Submission of the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Relator's Motion to Dismiss the Counterclaims of Defendant Midwestern Regional Medical Center, Inc. at 7, U.S. ex rel. Grandeau v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am., 99-C-8287 (E.D. Ill. Apr. 2, 2004) (“Implicit in the very purpose of the statute is an assumption that individuals who become qui tam relators possess and are willing to disclose to the government inside evidence of fraud ' whether in the form of documents or other information ' that their employers or other potential FCA defendants would rather that relators not disclose to the government.”). How can the relator strike the right balance?
Employer and Employee
From the defendant's perspective, the employee's duties of loyalty and confidentiality trump all other interests, and any breach is intolerable. As a result, after an employee gathers and discloses the evidence of fraud, employers often file counterclaims against relators for breach of confidentiality agreements, breach of fiduciary duty, and conversion. See, e.g., U.S. ex rel. Grandeau v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am., 350 F. Supp. 2d 765, 772-74 (N.D. Ill. 2004). In ruling on these counterclaims, courts consider several factors, including: 1) whether the relator had access to the documents in the course and scope of employment; 2) the relevancy of the documents; and 3) the applicability of a valid privilege or enforceability of a confidentiality agreement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.