Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Issue-Specific Withdrawal of the Reference

By Menachem O. Zelmanovitz and Rachel Jaffe Mauceri
May 27, 2012

Traditionally, defendants in actions brought by debtors or trustees have struggled to level the playing field and extricate themselves from the bankruptcy court, a forum often perceived as the plaintiff's “home court.” At one time, litigants hoped to utilize motions to withdraw the reference from the bankruptcy court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 157(d), to enhance their prospects of a favorable resolution from a presumably friendlier judicial forum. However, more often than not, movants were disappointed by the district courts' natural reluctance to relieve the bankruptcy courts of their intended role and increase their own considerable workloads.

The Supreme Court's recent ruling in Stern v. Marshall has revitalized this litigation tactic and encouraged a veritable torrent of such motions. In In re Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC (Madoff) alone, a liquidation proceeding under the Securities Investor Protection Act currently pending before the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, literally hundreds of such motions have been filed in the fraudulent transfer actions commenced by the trustee. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff has issued several orders withdrawing the reference, not with respect to the adversary proceedings in their entirety, and not even with respect to individual claims, but with respect to discrete issues underlying those claims (including the effect of Stern v. Marshall on the bankruptcy court's ability to hear and adjudicate avoidance claims).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.