Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Lehman Brothers' bankruptcy case was the largest and most complex Chapter 11 case in history. Among other complexities, when Lehman filed for bankruptcy on Sept. 15, 2008, it was a party to approximately 1.2 million derivative transactions with approximately 6,500 counterparties. Lehman had entered into derivative transactions through a number of wholly owned subsidiaries, both in a trading capacity and as an end-user. No Chapter 11 debtor had had as many or as complex a collection of derivative contracts. Disputes relating to the contracts threatened to become a quagmire of extensive and costly litigation. However, Judge James Peck, overseeing the Lehman bankruptcy, approved alternative procedures, proposed by Lehman's bankruptcy counsel (Weil, Gotshal & Manges), to resolve these disputes. This approach to these issues undoubtedly contributed to Lehman's ability to resolve its bankruptcy case with a consensual plan in less than three-and-a-half years.
Assessing the Situation
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.