Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When several parties ' usually a developer and one or more retailers who own land adjacent to the developer ' desire to make integrated use of their respective properties, they can enter into a Reciprocal Easement Agreement (REA, which may also be called a Construction, Operation and Reciprocal Easement Agreement, COREA). Both REA and COREA are terms that describe a type of agreement that can be used to control the development, use, and maintenance of several parcels of land. They impose obligations that “run with the land.” Thus, the respective owner-landlords will be subject to the restrictions of, and benefit from, the rights contained in a REA. This also means that prospective tenants may benefit from, and be subject to, a REA's rights and restrictions. Therefore, it is not only the lease itself that can affect the rights and obligations of a landlord and tenant; REAs, and other agreements made by third parties (who have interests that may or may not coincide with those of a tenant), can change the whole dynamic of a leasing transaction.
Note, however, that quite often it may not be obvious that several owners control a particular project. Because the construction, operation, and use of the property are governed by a single agreement, it may seem that it is owned by one entity. To determine if property is affected by an REA, carefully review a title report to see what covenants and restrictions apply. Only then will you know if an REA could impose unwanted restrictions on leased property.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.