Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The impact of a plaintiff's losing or destroying a product that is the subject litigation depends in large part on where the suit is pending. While attorneys likely appreciate the risk of judges applying spoliation law differently, they may not appreciate how spoliation jurisprudence can vary from state to state. For example, in some jurisdictions a finding of “bad faith” is required to impose sanctions. In others, whether “bad faith” exists or not is just one factor a court should evaluate when determining whether to impose sanctions. Still other courts do not even consider “bad faith” when determining whether to impose spoliation sanctions.
This article underscores the necessity of understanding the importance of preserving evidence given the jurisdictional differences in spoliation law. To illustrate these differences, we compare spoliation law in Georgia, Florida and Alabama ' three states that highlight the disparity in the law that can exist even between neighboring states in the same federal circuit.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.