Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

What's Scarier Than an Agency Audit? Three Agency Audits

By Robert G. Brody and Rebecca Goldberg
May 29, 2012

Misclassifying employees as “independent contractors” may put employers in triple jeopardy. (See article infra by Rosanna Sattler.) The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is teaming up with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and state agencies to crack down on “misclassification.” Thirteen state labor agencies have joined forces with the federal DOL in this initiative. This coordination will lead to a greater likelihood of companies being caught and a much higher cost for employers that have the unfortunate fate of the triple audit.

Misclassification occurs when an employer treats a worker as an independent contractor, even though the worker is actually an employee. The DOL has made this a top priority, seeking $3.8 million and 35 full-time workers to fight misclassification in its 2012 budget proposal. Misclassification costs the government tens of billions of dollars in lost tax revenue, so these agencies have a huge incentive to zealously pursue cases against employers.

Properly classifying a worker as an “employee” or “independent contractor” is a complicated task. Different agencies use different tests and no single factor controls. The tests use a multitude of factors (the IRS looks at 20 ), and the tests change over time.

If you wish to hire independent contractors, you should review the tests from different agencies at the state and federal levels and make an honest assessment of the situation. You should also consult with counsel knowledgeable about this area, particularly if you plan to hire many workers of this type. Skilled counsel can help determine the correct status of the worker and may draft an “independent contractor agreement” to help protect you if you get audited. Such an agreement should set forth facts supporting your determination. However, you cannot transform an employee into an independent contractor by agreement. If your situation remains unclear, you can request an agency opinion in advance, but remember that different agencies use different tests.

Finally, using outside counsel may help you avoid creating documents that the government can obtain from you which confirm the weakness in your determination that the worker is an independent contractor, i.e., the “smoking gun. For example, if your HR director writes your CEO a memo explaining why the classification may be wrong, and the government sees that memo, it is hard to argue you did not know the classification was questionable or, worse yet, simply wrong. However, if your attorney creates such a document, it is unlikely you will have to produce it to the government as your attorney will claim it is a privileged attorney-client communication.

While your prospective decisions are a concern, a bigger issue is what you should do if you may have already misclassified employees as independent contractors. Conduct an internal audit to reconsider old decisions, but be prepared to act on your findings. If you have already misclassified workers and are not currently being audited, consider the IRS's Voluntary Classification Settlement Program, which can reduce your liability without triggering an audit. Being proactive can help you avoid the administrative agency triple threat.


Robert G. Brody, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is the founding member of Brody and Associates, LLC. Rebecca Goldberg is an associate with the firm.

Misclassifying employees as “independent contractors” may put employers in triple jeopardy. (See article infra by Rosanna Sattler.) The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) is teaming up with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and state agencies to crack down on “misclassification.” Thirteen state labor agencies have joined forces with the federal DOL in this initiative. This coordination will lead to a greater likelihood of companies being caught and a much higher cost for employers that have the unfortunate fate of the triple audit.

Misclassification occurs when an employer treats a worker as an independent contractor, even though the worker is actually an employee. The DOL has made this a top priority, seeking $3.8 million and 35 full-time workers to fight misclassification in its 2012 budget proposal. Misclassification costs the government tens of billions of dollars in lost tax revenue, so these agencies have a huge incentive to zealously pursue cases against employers.

Properly classifying a worker as an “employee” or “independent contractor” is a complicated task. Different agencies use different tests and no single factor controls. The tests use a multitude of factors (the IRS looks at 20 ), and the tests change over time.

If you wish to hire independent contractors, you should review the tests from different agencies at the state and federal levels and make an honest assessment of the situation. You should also consult with counsel knowledgeable about this area, particularly if you plan to hire many workers of this type. Skilled counsel can help determine the correct status of the worker and may draft an “independent contractor agreement” to help protect you if you get audited. Such an agreement should set forth facts supporting your determination. However, you cannot transform an employee into an independent contractor by agreement. If your situation remains unclear, you can request an agency opinion in advance, but remember that different agencies use different tests.

Finally, using outside counsel may help you avoid creating documents that the government can obtain from you which confirm the weakness in your determination that the worker is an independent contractor, i.e., the “smoking gun. For example, if your HR director writes your CEO a memo explaining why the classification may be wrong, and the government sees that memo, it is hard to argue you did not know the classification was questionable or, worse yet, simply wrong. However, if your attorney creates such a document, it is unlikely you will have to produce it to the government as your attorney will claim it is a privileged attorney-client communication.

While your prospective decisions are a concern, a bigger issue is what you should do if you may have already misclassified employees as independent contractors. Conduct an internal audit to reconsider old decisions, but be prepared to act on your findings. If you have already misclassified workers and are not currently being audited, consider the IRS's Voluntary Classification Settlement Program, which can reduce your liability without triggering an audit. Being proactive can help you avoid the administrative agency triple threat.


Robert G. Brody, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is the founding member of Brody and Associates, LLC. Rebecca Goldberg is an associate with the firm.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.