Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Duty to Defend: Johnson Controls' Attempt to Turn Excess Insurance into Primary Insurance
In 1989, Milwaukee-based manufacturer Johnson Controls, Inc. initiated an insurance coverage action against 36 insurance companies seeking defense and coverage for potential environmental liability at various sites located around the country. This suit, which is still ongoing today, has generated a number of significant (and controversial) coverage opinions.
Most recently, in 2010, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin held that an indemnity-only umbrella excess liability policy contained a duty to defend by virtue of “follow form” policy language in the excess liability policy. The Wisconsin Supreme Court further held that the excess carrier's duty to defend was not conditioned upon exhaustion of the primary policy or any of the underlying layers of coverage. These rulings are contrary to the law in other states, and arguably convert low-premium, excess liability policies into primary policies when that clearly was not the parties' intention when the policies incepted.
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Law Firms are Reducing Redundant Real Estate by Bringing Support Services Back to the Office
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Bit Parts
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
Risks of “Baseball Arbitration” in Resolving Real Estate Disputes
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.