Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

NJ Online Gambling Measure Clears Assembly Panel

By David Gialanella
May 31, 2012

Legislation to allow online gambling in New Jersey continues to make progress, despite concerns over its constitutionality.

The Assembly Regulatory Oversight and Gaming Committee passed A-2578 in a 3-1 vote on May 10, a month after it won a Senate committee's approval. (See the Bill at http://bit.ly/Juc7M5.)

The measure would allow casinos to accept wagers via the Internet from gamblers in the state, though an amendment contemplates allowing out-of-state bets if authorities determine it would be legal.

The bill provides that computers, servers and hubs be physically located in licensed casino/hotels and be monitored and regulated by the Division of Gaming Enforcement.

The division would continuously monitor casino equipment for the capability to verify a bettor's physical location within state boundaries.

The committee's amendments, including the provisions for out-of-state bets, provide for a 20% tax on gross online gambling revenues, twice the 10% tax rate contemplated in the Senate version of the bill, S-1565 (http://bit.ly/JucPcg).

The committee also removed a horseracing subsidy that Gov. Chris Christie objected to in vetoing prior online gambling legislation.

Despite general support for the legislation, several lawmakers on voiced concerns that such a change would amount to gambling expansion beyond Atlantic City's municipal boundaries, thus requiring a voter-approved constitutional amendment.

The legislation's proponents have maintained that, so long as the servers and other equipment are located within the city, any online bet would be considered placed in Atlantic City.

Assemblyman Ralph Caputo D-Essex) cast the lone “no” vote, saying he does not oppose the bill in principle but believes the question should be answered in a referendum, citing legal opinions from the Office of Legislative Services and elsewhere that online gambling would require a constitutional amendment.

Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester), the sponsor of A-2578 and a committee member, said he would support racetrack gambling parlors “if there's a way to strike a concession” with Christie.

Sen. Raymond Lesniak (D-Union), the sponsor of S-1565 and prior iterations of the bill, told the committee that passage of the legislation could lead to suits challenging the law's constitutionality.

Lesniak added that passage would put the state in the forefront of legal online gambling, and allow other states unable to make the investment in infrastructure to partner with New Jersey, generating further revenue.

Christie vetoed an online gambling bill last year, saying a referendum would be required.

During a late May visit to Atlantic City to promote tourism there, Christie said he would try to get sports betting in the city before the fall, readying legislation after NJ voters passed a referendum last November.


David Gialanella is a Reproter for the New Jersey Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

Legislation to allow online gambling in New Jersey continues to make progress, despite concerns over its constitutionality.

The Assembly Regulatory Oversight and Gaming Committee passed A-2578 in a 3-1 vote on May 10, a month after it won a Senate committee's approval. (See the Bill at http://bit.ly/Juc7M5.)

The measure would allow casinos to accept wagers via the Internet from gamblers in the state, though an amendment contemplates allowing out-of-state bets if authorities determine it would be legal.

The bill provides that computers, servers and hubs be physically located in licensed casino/hotels and be monitored and regulated by the Division of Gaming Enforcement.

The division would continuously monitor casino equipment for the capability to verify a bettor's physical location within state boundaries.

The committee's amendments, including the provisions for out-of-state bets, provide for a 20% tax on gross online gambling revenues, twice the 10% tax rate contemplated in the Senate version of the bill, S-1565 (http://bit.ly/JucPcg).

The committee also removed a horseracing subsidy that Gov. Chris Christie objected to in vetoing prior online gambling legislation.

Despite general support for the legislation, several lawmakers on voiced concerns that such a change would amount to gambling expansion beyond Atlantic City's municipal boundaries, thus requiring a voter-approved constitutional amendment.

The legislation's proponents have maintained that, so long as the servers and other equipment are located within the city, any online bet would be considered placed in Atlantic City.

Assemblyman Ralph Caputo D-Essex) cast the lone “no” vote, saying he does not oppose the bill in principle but believes the question should be answered in a referendum, citing legal opinions from the Office of Legislative Services and elsewhere that online gambling would require a constitutional amendment.

Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester), the sponsor of A-2578 and a committee member, said he would support racetrack gambling parlors “if there's a way to strike a concession” with Christie.

Sen. Raymond Lesniak (D-Union), the sponsor of S-1565 and prior iterations of the bill, told the committee that passage of the legislation could lead to suits challenging the law's constitutionality.

Lesniak added that passage would put the state in the forefront of legal online gambling, and allow other states unable to make the investment in infrastructure to partner with New Jersey, generating further revenue.

Christie vetoed an online gambling bill last year, saying a referendum would be required.

During a late May visit to Atlantic City to promote tourism there, Christie said he would try to get sports betting in the city before the fall, readying legislation after NJ voters passed a referendum last November.


David Gialanella is a Reproter for the New Jersey Law Journal, an ALM affiliate of Internet Law & Strategy.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions Image

During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.

How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using? Image

What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.

Generative AI and the 2024 Elections: Risks, Realities, and Lessons for Businesses Image

GenAI's ability to produce highly sophisticated and convincing content at a fraction of the previous cost has raised fears that it could amplify misinformation. The dissemination of fake audio, images and text could reshape how voters perceive candidates and parties. Businesses, too, face challenges in managing their reputations and navigating this new terrain of manipulated content.

Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients Image

As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.

Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support Image

The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.