Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Legislation to allow online gambling in New Jersey continues to make progress, despite concerns over its constitutionality.
The Assembly Regulatory Oversight and Gaming Committee passed A-2578 in a 3-1 vote on May 10, a month after it won a Senate committee's approval. (See the Bill at http://bit.ly/Juc7M5.)
The measure would allow casinos to accept wagers via the Internet from gamblers in the state, though an amendment contemplates allowing out-of-state bets if authorities determine it would be legal.
The bill provides that computers, servers and hubs be physically located in licensed casino/hotels and be monitored and regulated by the Division of Gaming Enforcement.
The division would continuously monitor casino equipment for the capability to verify a bettor's physical location within state boundaries.
The committee's amendments, including the provisions for out-of-state bets, provide for a 20% tax on gross online gambling revenues, twice the 10% tax rate contemplated in the Senate version of the bill, S-1565 (http://bit.ly/JucPcg).
The committee also removed a horseracing subsidy that Gov. Chris Christie objected to in vetoing prior online gambling legislation.
Despite general support for the legislation, several lawmakers on voiced concerns that such a change would amount to gambling expansion beyond Atlantic City's municipal boundaries, thus requiring a voter-approved constitutional amendment.
The legislation's proponents have maintained that, so long as the servers and other equipment are located within the city, any online bet would be considered placed in Atlantic City.
Assemblyman Ralph Caputo D-Essex) cast the lone “no” vote, saying he does not oppose the bill in principle but believes the question should be answered in a referendum, citing legal opinions from the Office of Legislative Services and elsewhere that online gambling would require a constitutional amendment.
Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester), the sponsor of A-2578 and a committee member, said he would support racetrack gambling parlors “if there's a way to strike a concession” with Christie.
Sen. Raymond Lesniak (D-Union), the sponsor of S-1565 and prior iterations of the bill, told the committee that passage of the legislation could lead to suits challenging the law's constitutionality.
Lesniak added that passage would put the state in the forefront of legal online gambling, and allow other states unable to make the investment in infrastructure to partner with New Jersey, generating further revenue.
Christie vetoed an online gambling bill last year, saying a referendum would be required.
During a late May visit to Atlantic City to promote tourism there, Christie said he would try to get sports betting in the city before the fall, readying legislation after NJ voters passed a referendum last November.
Legislation to allow online gambling in New Jersey continues to make progress, despite concerns over its constitutionality.
The Assembly Regulatory Oversight and Gaming Committee passed A-2578 in a 3-1 vote on May 10, a month after it won a Senate committee's approval. (See the Bill at http://bit.ly/Juc7M5.)
The measure would allow casinos to accept wagers via the Internet from gamblers in the state, though an amendment contemplates allowing out-of-state bets if authorities determine it would be legal.
The bill provides that computers, servers and hubs be physically located in licensed casino/hotels and be monitored and regulated by the Division of Gaming Enforcement.
The division would continuously monitor casino equipment for the capability to verify a bettor's physical location within state boundaries.
The committee's amendments, including the provisions for out-of-state bets, provide for a 20% tax on gross online gambling revenues, twice the 10% tax rate contemplated in the Senate version of the bill, S-1565 (http://bit.ly/JucPcg).
The committee also removed a horseracing subsidy that Gov. Chris Christie objected to in vetoing prior online gambling legislation.
Despite general support for the legislation, several lawmakers on voiced concerns that such a change would amount to gambling expansion beyond Atlantic City's municipal boundaries, thus requiring a voter-approved constitutional amendment.
The legislation's proponents have maintained that, so long as the servers and other equipment are located within the city, any online bet would be considered placed in Atlantic City.
Assemblyman Ralph Caputo D-Essex) cast the lone “no” vote, saying he does not oppose the bill in principle but believes the question should be answered in a referendum, citing legal opinions from the Office of Legislative Services and elsewhere that online gambling would require a constitutional amendment.
Assemblyman John Burzichelli (D-Gloucester), the sponsor of A-2578 and a committee member, said he would support racetrack gambling parlors “if there's a way to strike a concession” with Christie.
Sen. Raymond Lesniak (D-Union), the sponsor of S-1565 and prior iterations of the bill, told the committee that passage of the legislation could lead to suits challenging the law's constitutionality.
Lesniak added that passage would put the state in the forefront of legal online gambling, and allow other states unable to make the investment in infrastructure to partner with New Jersey, generating further revenue.
Christie vetoed an online gambling bill last year, saying a referendum would be required.
During a late May visit to Atlantic City to promote tourism there, Christie said he would try to get sports betting in the city before the fall, readying legislation after NJ voters passed a referendum last November.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.