Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Creating a Value-Based Relationship with Your Outside Counsel

By Adam J. Schlagman
June 26, 2012

Michael Roster has been a vocal advocate for re-thinking the management and philosophy of running a legal department for many years. He began developing his innovative strategies while serving as a partner at Morrison & Foerster, managing the firm's Los Angeles office and serving on its policy committee.

He was able to put these ideas into practice in 1993 upon being named General Counsel of Stanford University, Stanford Medical Center and Stanford Management Company. Well before the idea was even close to fashionable, Roster moved nearly all of Stanford's outside legal work to a handful of law firms working on fixed price retainers for both counseling and litigation. But more than just an initiating an economic strategy, Roster integrated these attorneys into the fabric of the legal department to create a value-based relationship that incorporated his vision of how to maximize efficiency and function. He supplied Stanford's outside firms with on-site offices so the attorneys could attend the weekly staff meetings. In addition, these attorneys were listed in the telephone directories as though they were formal members of the law department staff. In short, outside counsel were embraced as part of the team instead of keeping them at arm's length.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.