Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Off-Label Communications

By Areta L. Kupchyk and and Tracey B. Ehlers
June 27, 2012

While the FDA has had a long-standing policy of permitting drug, biologics, and medical device companies to respond to unsolicited requests for information about off-label use of their products, there has been significant discussion over what constitutes “unsolicited” in this context. On July 5, 2011, seven medical products companies filed a “citizen petition” with the FDA, asking for clarification of several issues, including: 1) responses to unsolicited requests; 2) the meaning of scientific exchange; 3) the appropriate interactions with formulary committees, payors, and similar entities; and 4) the dissemination of third-party clinical practice guidelines. Although the Citizen Petition is pending, on Dec. 23, 2011, the FDA issued a draft guidance that addresses the first issue in the Petition. In the draft guidance titled “Responding to Unsolicited Requests for Off-Label Information About Prescription Drugs and Medical Devices,” the FDA describes how drug, biologics, and medical device manufacturers should respond to unsolicited requests for off-label information, including ' for the first time ' communications via the Internet and social media. (“Draft Guidance” is the FDA's proposed approach to compliance with a legal or regulatory requirement. When finalized, the draft guidance will represent the FDA's current thinking on this topic. Neither a draft nor final guidance creates or confers any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind the FDA or the public. A person can use an alternative approach if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.)

Overview of the Draft Guidance

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.